Can I Create a Fair Match Schedule for a Competition with Less Than 60 Teams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoeOfTexas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm
AI Thread Summary
Creating a fair match schedule for a competition with fewer than 60 teams is achievable by utilizing a round-robin schedule generator. If only 58 teams participate, one can randomly select a subset of rounds from a complete schedule to ensure each team plays a set number of matches without repeating opponents. Additionally, the Swiss system can be employed, pairing teams based on similar records, which may enhance fairness depending on the tournament's goals. The discussion emphasizes that mixing teams of different sizes (5 or 6) can still maintain fairness. Overall, both methods provide viable solutions for organizing matches in a competitive setting.
JoeOfTexas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am having a competition with up to 60 teams. My idea was to break the 60 teams into 10 groups of 6 teams each and run a Round Robin tournament for each individual group. Simple.

Here is my problem:

What if less than 60 teams show up to the competition (i.e. 58 teams)?

An idea I am exploring for fairness is to pair up X opponents to each team from the entire pool of N teams, without pairing the same teams twice.

Is this possible and if so, is there an algorithm that can do this?

Thanks,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think some teams with 6 and some with 5 (selected randomly) are not significantly less fair than 10 teams with 6 (again, selected randomly - you can get harder and easier groups there anyway). If you want to keep the number of matches for each team the same, let the teams in the smaller groups make matches against (random?) teams in other groups.
 
An idea I am exploring for fairness is to pair up X opponents to each team from the entire pool of N teams, without pairing the same teams twice.

Is this possible and if so, is there an algorithm that can do this?
Yes, it's possible. Just take your favorite round-robin schedule generator (these are available online). Have it generate a complete round-robin schedule for all 58 teams. Don't worry, you won't use the whole thing.

Now, randomly select 5 of the 57 rounds from the schedule. Play only those rounds. Voila! You have a tournament where each team plays exactly 5 others and no two teams play each other twice.

Alternatively, you could use the Swiss system, which has the property that most teams will be paired against other teams with similar records. Whether that is desirable or undesirable depends on the nature of your tournament, I suppose.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top