Can I prove the statement if n^2 is odd, then n must be odd by contradiction?

xeon123
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
I never understand the proof by contradiction, because somewhere in the middle I always lost myself.

In this https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=523874 there's an example of proof by contradiction.

If n is an integer such that n^2 is odd, then n must be odd.

So assume that n is an integer such that n^2 is odd. There are 2 possible cases: n can be odd or n can be even. If we show that n cannot be even, then it must be odd.
So, assume that n is even, then it has the form n=2k. But then n2=(2k)^2=4k^2=2(2k^2). This has the form 2m (with m=2k^2), thus n^2 is even. But we made the assumption that n^2 was odd, so we have reached a contradiction. So, n cannot be even (otherwise n^2 must be even), hence n must be odd.


We assume that if n^2 is odd than n is odd. This means that if n^2 is even, n can be odd or even. How can I proof a contradiction if n is even? It doesn't tell me nothing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, n^2 even implies n even. You are trying to show that if n^2 is odd, then n must be odd. So you assume that it's not true, i.e. if n^2 is odd then n is not necessarily odd. The only other choice is n is even. So suppose n^2 is odd and n is even. The result above is that if n is even then n^2 is also even. This contradicts the original assertion that n^2 was odd so it can not be true that if n^2 is odd, then n is even. The only choice left is that if n^2 is odd, then n is odd.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top