Can I pursue physics and math without a science background?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hangover
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the decision of a 19-year-old from Hong Kong to transition from studying business in secondary school to pursuing physics and mathematics at university. Concerns are raised about the potential risks associated with this shift, particularly due to limited prior knowledge in these subjects. It is noted that the first year of university will be challenging, but success in that period can alleviate concerns about previous academic background. The importance of catching up on mathematics before university is emphasized, suggesting that self-study or additional courses could be beneficial. The conversation also highlights that individuals can still pursue their interests independently and attend classes outside their major. The example of Ed Witten, a renowned physicist with a non-science background, is mentioned to illustrate that diverse educational paths can lead to success in physics and mathematics.
hangover
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I am 19 and from Hong Kong. I love this forum very much!
I studied business subjects in secondary school(high school) but i am going to study physics and mathematics in university. Therefore, i only have limited knowledge in physics and math.
Although the university will provide some bridging courses to me, is this decision too risky?


Besides, is it possible to be a physicist or a mathematician if i did not study science in secondary school(high school)?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The risk is only in the first year, actually. You will make it or you won't. You will catch up and be good at it, or you won't. After the first year, what you've done in high school matters little. The amount of science and maths you will have to deal with is in any case much bigger than what you could have done during all the years in HS.
You will have a harder time than others in the beginning, and the other thing is, you know less whether you really like the material and whether you will be good at it. That would be different if you had done a more science-oriented HS. But if it turns out that you can handle the first year, then this problem will be gone.

Some advice: if you can, try to use the time that is still left to catch up with maths. Maybe there are courses you can follow, or maybe you can study on yourself using a book or so. It will be time well spend. It will reduce the "step" you will have to make.

As an anekdote: one of the greatest mathematical physicists alive, Ed Witten, is actually a historian by education, if I'm not mistaking.
 
If I were in your shoes,
I will just major in physics/math and minor in another
since double major takes too many risks especially in hong kong educational system (three years of college)

you know, you can study whatever you like whenever on your own. And while you are at college, you can always sit in classes =)
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top