Can I Succeed in Senior Year Math Without Making Friends with My Classmates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qspeechc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Senior Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges faced by a senior math student who feels isolated from classmates and questions the feasibility of succeeding academically without collaboration. Participants emphasize the importance of working with peers, regardless of friendship, as a means to enhance understanding and performance. They argue that collaboration is essential in education, contrasting it with a competitive mindset that can hinder learning. Suggestions include initiating conversations about coursework with classmates, as many may also be seeking help. The conversation highlights that mutual support can benefit all students, and using available resources, such as forums, can provide additional assistance. Overall, the consensus is that cooperation is crucial for academic success, even among those who do not socialize outside of class.
qspeechc
Messages
839
Reaction score
15
Hi everyone.

So I am almost a senior math student. The senior year is obviously difficult and the classes small, and I was worried that I am not going to be friends with any of the other senior math students. This means I will be working on my own as opposed to in a group like the other students. Is it possible to do well without talking about the material with your classmates? And please don't tell me to make friends with them, that's just not going to happen. I will have known them for three years and not had any interest in being friends with them (I am just very different from the other math students, like I'm an outsider).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have to be friends to work together. I work regularly with fellow students that I don't speak outside college. We both benefit from it.
Just ask the guy who happens to sit next to you 'did you understand the last part of the proof?', or 'I didn't get exercise 5, did you?', or something like that, and he's probably willing to talk to you. You're all math students, it's just professional.
 
What Landau said.

Also, at some point you simply have to get used to collaborating with people that are NOT your friends (at the social level). Being able to work with people is an important skill that you will need regardless of what career you go into.
 
Almost like me talking. Writing.

I've always felt that it's not appropriate to ask someone who's not your friend. The students are somewhat like competitors (who gets to be the best) and guard their answers zealously. Why would they want to give me a free ride if it's not guaranteed it's worth it?

I think the difference to stricly professional environment is that if we'd be employees then we'd be paid to get results, and part of it would be helping your co-workers (though as far as I know backstabbing and such is a standard unofficial procedure in a corporate environment).

But if I ask for help as a student, I'm just helping myself.
 
Last edited:
osc said:
I've always felt that it's not appropriate to ask someone who's not your friend. The students are somewhat like competitors (who gets to be the best) and guard their answers zealously. Why would they want to give me a free ride if it's not guaranteed it's worth it?

You're wrong. Looking at education as a competition is a horrible idea. I've always worked together with people both in undergrad and now in grad school. Especially in grad school, none of us would finish the homework without at least a little help from someone else in the class. We learn from each other as well as the lecture.

Treating education as a competition with those sitting next to you means that everyone loses and gets less out of the class.
 
We'll all be friends with you!

Ok, editing post, that wasn't very constructive.

But you can't assume that your classmates aren't struggling at all either. Perhaps an agreement could be made, you know, for mutual benefit.

Anyway, you always have this gigantic forum to consult with.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top