Can I take Physics B, or shouldn't I?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thundagere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around whether a student in early 9th grade should skip directly to AP Physics B despite not having taken a prior physics course. The student expresses a strong passion for physics and mathematics, feeling confident in their self-taught knowledge of trigonometry and differentiation. Concerns from relatives about the difficulty of the course are noted, but the student seeks reassurance from the forum community. Responses suggest that if the student is interested in physics, they should take the class, as it provides a broad overview of various topics that will be beneficial for college. Additionally, taking Physics C is recommended for those who are comfortable with calculus, as it may offer a more advanced challenge.
Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Now, before we go anywhere, I'm sorry if this is in the wrong place. If so, can someone direct me as to where it should be.
I'm currently in middle school/high school education level. (Early 9th, but have yet to learn anything new, so...). I do love physics and mathematics, and they're a passion of mine. Our school required biology in freshman year, so no physics. However... my sister took physics last year. I opened her book, and frankly, the problems were all ridiculously easy. I'm not ego talking here, but after everything I studied, they were simple. It makes me wonder now, should I skip directly to AP Physics B? ALthough it was never taught, I know trignometry (I taught myself for vectors), and differentiation (this is fairly low level, but I can differentiate polynomials, products, division, etc...).
I've had a lot of negative feedback upon asking my relatives, who have said "Oh, it'll be far too difficult!" However, with my current knowledge, I'm fairly sure I can do it.
Obviously though, I want a second opinion before going anywhere. I'm pretty sure everyone here is probably way better than me when it comes to physics, so they probably have a better idea than me of what physics B entails (as I've seen our school's physics A/Honors physics book already). Do you guys feel that I could do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physic B isn't that hard. If you are interested in physics take it. The class gives you a little taste of a bunch of different topics in physics which will be help when you go to college. Now if you school offers physics C take that one. If you know how to take a derivative and integrate the mechanics part on the physics C test would not be to hard to challenge the test after taking physics B.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top