Can I Use Calculus to Explore the Results of My Bouncing Ball Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on using calculus to analyze the results of a bouncing ball experiment, where a linear relationship between drop height and bounce height was established. The participant seeks to explore additional insights from the data beyond predicting bounce heights, specifically in relation to calculus applications. Suggestions include examining the potential and kinetic energies of the ball at each bounce, which could provide a deeper understanding of energy conservation principles. The relevance of Newton's Third Law is also mentioned, indicating its connection to the forces involved in the bouncing process. Overall, the conversation encourages further exploration of physics concepts linked to the experiment's findings.
iamBevan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi guys - recently in college we have done an experiment where we drop a ball from 10 different heights, and recorded the bounce height. Obviously all the results were tabulated, and then a graph produced. It turns out that the graph is linear, and I have worked out y=mx+c, so am able to predict the bounce height with just the initial height.

I was just wondering if there is anything else I can explore from the results, other than just predicting the bounce height? Is there anything I can do that would test my calculus?

(I'm living in the UK, so when I say college I mean A-Levels)

Thanks!

P.S. Also I am wondering how this fits in with Newton's Laws. I'm guessing his Third Law has particular relevance here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, not sure how to delete this post - I have reposted in the homework section...
 
How about the Potential and Kinetic energies (if you haven't done that already) of the ball at every bounce?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top