Can Induction Prove the Sum of i^5 from 1 to n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom McCurdy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Sums
AI Thread Summary
the discussion focuses on proving the formula for the sum of i^5 from 1 to n using mathematical induction. The original formula presented may contain a typo, suggesting it should be n^2(n+1)^2(2n^2+2n+1)/12 instead of n^2(n+1)^2(2n^2+2n-1)/12. The base case for n=1 confirms the formula holds true, while the inductive step involves substituting k+1 into the formula and expanding it. The participants encountered difficulties in reverting to the original equation, indicating potential algebraic errors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying algebraic steps in the proof process.
Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1
I was trying to help a friend do the following problem

Prove with induction

Sum of i^5 from 1 to n =

\frac{n^2(n+1)^2(2n^2+2n-1}{12}

we got it to

\frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2(2k^2+4k+2)+2k+1}{12} but we can't seem to get it to go back to the orginal equation when you substitue k+1 into the orignal formula
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you might made an algebra mistake

try plug an integer into k... you'll see the numerator is odd and the denominator is even, which mean the answer is not even an integer...

check your algebra....
 


First, it is important to note that the original formula may have a typo and should be \frac{n^2(n+1)^2(2n^2+2n+1)}{12} instead of \frac{n^2(n+1)^2(2n^2+2n-1}{12}. I will proceed with the assumption that this is the correct formula.

To prove this formula using induction, we need to show that it holds true for the base case (n=1) and then prove the inductive step, which is to show that if it holds true for n=k, then it also holds true for n=k+1.

Base case (n=1):
When n=1, the formula becomes \frac{1^2(1+1)^2(2(1)^2+2(1)+1)}{12} = \frac{1(4)(3)}{12} = \frac{12}{12} = 1. This is indeed the sum of i^5 from 1 to 1, so the formula holds true for the base case.

Inductive step:
Assuming the formula holds true for n=k, we need to show that it also holds true for n=k+1. Substituting k+1 into the original formula, we get:

\frac{(k+1)^2((k+1)+1)^2(2(k+1)^2+2(k+1)+1)}{12} = \frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2(2k^2+4k+3)}{12}

Expanding this expression, we get:

\frac{(k^2+2k+1)(k^2+4k+4)(2k^2+4k+3)}{12} = \frac{2k^6+12k^5+30k^4+44k^3+38k^2+17k+3}{12}

Using the formula given in the problem, we can rewrite this expression as:

\frac{2k^6+12k^5+30k^4+44k^3+38k^2+17k+3}{12} = \frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2(2k^2+4k+2)+2k+1}{12}

We can see that
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top