Can Jupiter Become a Stable Star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bavid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jupiter Star
AI Thread Summary
Jupiter lacks the necessary mass to become a stable star, even if artificially compressed. The gravity-radiation pressure equilibrium required for nuclear fusion cannot be achieved with its current mass. Initiating fusion would likely only be temporary, as removing the artificial pressure would extinguish the reaction. Sub-stellar objects like brown dwarfs need significantly more mass than Jupiter to sustain fusion. Without advanced technology to maintain fusion or increase mass, Jupiter cannot transition into a stable star.
Bavid
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
With its current mass, can Jupiter become a stable star? Suppose Jupiter was artificially compressed to only a fraction of its present size (a hypothetical situation occurring in at least one work of science fiction), would the gravity-radiation pressure equilibrium be reached at all? It appears to me that even if it were possible to forcibly initiate nuclear fusion at the core, the mass of the planet is not high enough to form a stable star.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Bavid said:
With its current mass, can Jupiter become a stable star? Suppose Jupiter was artificially compressed to only a fraction of its present size (a hypothetical situation occurring in at least one work of science fiction), would the gravity-radiation pressure equilibrium be reached at all? It appears to me that even if it were possible to forcibly initiate nuclear fusion at the core, the mass of the planet is not high enough to form a stable star.

I read once long ago that Jupiter had almost enough mass to be a star.

If it were artificially ignited it seems to me that as soon as the artificial pressure were removed it would go out. unless there is something I don't know about.
 
Sub stellar masses like Brown dwarfs require over seventy times the mass of Jupiter to begin fusion in their core. I'm not sure if there is any validity in the science fiction ideas, I can't see how you could stabily compress a planet without the outward pressure pushing it back out.
 
Fusion processes would heat the core of Jupiter and therefore increase the pressure - and make Jupiter larger and less dense, compared to the current state.
Unless you invent something fancy which could catalyze fusion or feed a large amount of deuterium+tritium (maybe that could burn, until the tritium is decayed) into the core or whatever, you won't get stable fusion there.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top