Can kg/m2h Be Converted to m/s for Process Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chispofish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conversion of kg/m²h to m/s is not a direct transformation but rather a calculation involving mass flux and linear velocity. To convert kg/m²h to m/s, first convert mass flow to volumetric flow by dividing by density. Then, recognize that m³/m²h equals 1 m/h, which allows for the determination of linear velocity. Finally, divide by 3600 to adjust from hours to seconds, resulting in the correct linear velocity in m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass flux and linear velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of SI base units and their conversions
  • Familiarity with density calculations
  • Basic skills in dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research volumetric flow rate calculations in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about density and its role in mass flow conversions
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques for unit conversions
  • Study the principles of mass transfer coefficients in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, process designers, and anyone involved in fluid dynamics or mass transfer calculations will benefit from this discussion.

chispofish
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there a wat to transform kg/m2h to m/s

I'm not sure if kg/m2h is for Evaporation coefficient, Water flux,Drying rate or Mass transfer coefficient. However one of the can be transform to m/s (maybe Impingement velocity)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't see how you would do that. You are talking about base units in the SI system (except for hours which is easily replaced by seconds). There's no direct conversion.
 
kg/m2h is a mass flux of a substance through an area
m/s is the linear velocity of that substance

Therefore, step 1 is to convert the mass flow to volumetric flow (divide by density).
then you'll need to realize that:
m3/m2h = 1 m/h
so, the volume passing through an area per time equals linear velocity.

Then divide by 3600 to get the /h in stead of /s. (3600 seconds in 1 hour).
 
That's a calculation, not a conversion/transformation. I guess I shouldn't take the posts so literally.
 
FredGarvin said:
That's a calculation, not a conversion/transformation. I guess I shouldn't take the posts so literally.

Hehe... you probably shouldn't. On internet you can never be sure you're talking to a native English speaker (who can be expected to choose exactly the right words) or someone (like me) who is merely likely to choose the right words :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
669
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K