Can Knotted Closed Strings Exist in Higher Dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alwi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Alwi
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all ! I am curious about the possibility of knotted strings. If we can accept the propagation of closed loop strings, then shouldn't we consider the possibility of knotted, closed loop strings ?

I do not see - offhand - any reason why a closed string cannot be knotted. Think of a propagating trefoil knot for example.

Of course - I would expect the mathematics to be much more involved. For a knotted closed string, the world-sheet is much more than a mere Riemann surface. It is now a general Algebraic Surface that may possesses self-intersections and other topological phenomena.

In this case - I would expect the knottedness of the string to have implications on the compact extra-dimensions.

I would like to hear some comments and ideas regarding this matter.

Best Regards
Alwi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The knotting of a string is topologically non-trivial only in 3 dimensions. For string theory you need a whole lot more dimensions, and so every string would be topologically equivalent to the unkot.

On the other hand, you could fool around a bit with compactified dimensions which leads to winding string around dimensions and so.

Furthermore, the concept of knotting quickly leads to concepts such as category theory and topological quantum field theory in particular. These are abstract mathematical structures and serve as a framework for string theory. So to consider "knotted strings" is in fact equivalent to studying these framework in relation to string theory.
 
Dear xepma,

No I disagree with your statement that every string will be topologically equivalent to the unknot. Knottedness can take place totally in the large 3+1 dimensions. The compact extra dimensions need not unravel that knottedness. It all depends on how we do our compactification and the kinds of homotopy we want to consider. You can easily construct a knot in S^3 x G where G is a compact space. Just do your knotting in S^3 and trivially multiply by G. Can you find a homotopy in S^3 x G that unravels this knot ? Yes and no. If you restrict yourself to homotopies entirely done in S^3 - then of course you cannot unravel the knot.

I think the issue that I want to raise here - to be very precise - is whether we should :

1) Include a knot topological term in the Polyakov action (for Bosonic strings) and

2) Include self-intersecting Algebraic Surfaces of knot world-sheets -- when performing a sum-over-surfaces a-la Polyakov's path integral approach.

Best Regards
Alwi
 
Dear Xepma,

Here is also another reason why I think knotted strings ought to be considered. Its not clear to me that one can always find a homotopy involving the compact extra dimension - that will unknot the knotted string. What makes you think that there will be no obstructions ? Maybe the compact extra dimensions possesses holes (as required for the number of fermion generations) etc which makes some types of homotopy impossible.

So you see - knotted strings are not necessarily trivial by virtue of the extra dimensions.

Best Regards
Alwi
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top