Can Light Curve Space-Time and Create a Gravity Well?

mdj
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a question that has been bugging me since my Special relativity course... (uhm that would be two years now...)
We all know that matter produces a gravitywell that bends light. That has been shown lots of times, in fact astrophysics would be a bit dull if that didn't happen... But how about the other way around? Can light curve space-time? and create a gravity well?
If so has it been detected? how much would all those cute little photons "in-transit" between stars contribute to the space-time curvature? I guess that has all long been thought of (could be ironic though if dark matter turned out to be light :biggrin: )

Anyway, would someone please enlighten me?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the energy in a photon does curve spacetime, although really not very much :). The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress-energy_tensor" on the right-hand side of Einstein's equation G_{\mu\nu}=8\pi T_{\mu\nu} describes how the existence and flow of both matter and energy curve spacetime. I have no idea if this has ever been measured, although I would have to guess not due to how little a photon would actually bend spacetime and how short a time it would stay in anyone place. Perhaps a laser would have enough of an effect in a really sensitive lab setup...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mdj said:
I have a question that has been bugging me since my Special relativity course... (uhm that would be two years now...)
We all know that matter produces a gravitywell that bends light. That has been shown lots of times, in fact astrophysics would be a bit dull if that didn't happen... But how about the other way around? Can light curve space-time? and create a gravity well?
If so has it been detected? how much would all those cute little photons "in-transit" between stars contribute to the space-time curvature? I guess that has all long been thought of (could be ironic though if dark matter turned out to be light :biggrin: )

Anyway, would someone please enlighten me?

Thanks :)

There's no question that light contributes to the stress-energy tensor, and hence gravitation.

Quantifying how much is a bit tricky. You might take a look at

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=116769

This gives some results for what happens if you have a "box" of light, which is a simple static case.

The detailed results for this case are not particularly intuitve, because pressure causes gravity.

You might also want to check out the "radiation dominated" era of cosmology. In the early history of the universe, cosmology was dominated by radiation - most of the gravity in the universe was due to "light".
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top