Can Light Travel Faster Than c in Diamagnetic Materials?

AI Thread Summary
The speed of light in a vacuum is defined as 1 / sqrt(mu_0 e_0), while in matter, it is modified by relative permittivity and permeability, resulting in a speed of c / sqrt(k_m k_e). In diamagnetic materials, k_m is less than 1, which raises questions about light traveling faster than 3 * 10^8 m/s, but this assumption misinterprets the role of C, which remains constant. The discussion clarifies that the speed of light in matter reflects phase velocity, not group velocity, with the latter always being less than the speed of light in a vacuum. Furthermore, while some materials exhibit a phase velocity exceeding the speed of light, the group velocity, which is relevant for energy and information transfer, is consistently lower. Understanding these distinctions is crucial in the study of light propagation in different materials.
conquerer7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
The speed of light in vacuum is 1 / sqrt(mu_0 e_0). In matter, this is modified using relative permittivity and permeability, so the speed of light in matter is c / sqrt(k_m k_e).

In diamagnetic materials, isn't k_m < 1? Then we'd have light going faster than 3 * 10^8 m/s in, say, nitrogen gas, which is diamagnetic. What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're mostly correct, except for the assumption that C would be the variable that changes. C will stay constant, and relative permittivity will go up accordingly.
 
conquerer7 said:
so the speed of light in matter is c / sqrt(k_m k_e).
This is the phase velocity, not the group velocity. And don't forget the k_e-part, which is usually dominant in matter.

There are materials with a phase velocity larger than the speed of light in vacuum and even materials with negative phase velocity. However, the group velocity (the thing which can carry energy and information, neglecting losses here) is always smaller than that.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top