Can Linear and Angular Momentum Be Combined in Mechanics?

Click For Summary
A point mass moving in the x-y plane with constant velocity has a constant linear momentum of mv and an angular momentum of mrv about the origin. As the mass moves towards infinity in the positive x direction, its angular momentum approaches zero, raising questions about the conservation of angular momentum. The discussion clarifies that while the angle θ decreases, the position vector's modulus increases, keeping angular momentum constant. It is noted that all linear motion not directed radially possesses angular momentum about the origin. However, linear and angular momentum cannot be combined into a total momentum due to their differing units.
dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi,

I,ve been looking through some notes on Lagrangian mechanics but they have got me confused so i'll start from the beginning.
If a point mass is moving in the x-y plane with constant velocity v at a y-coordinate r then it has linear momentum mv which is a constant but it has an angular momentum about the origin of mrv at x=0 ? If the point mass continues in the positive x direction towards ∞ then it its angular momentum must tend to zero ? What happens to conservation of angular momentum ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are your sure that the angular momentum would tend toward zero? What happens to the angular velocity as the mass continues moving in the positive direction?
 
I was using angular momentum=mrvsinθ and as x→0 then sinθ→0
 
I meant as x→∞ then θ→0 and sinθ→0
 
I've figured that now. The angle gets smaller but the modulus of the position vector gets bigger so the angular momentum stays the same.
So all linear motion that is not radial has an angular momentum about the origin ?
For a point mass is there such a thing as total momentum combining linear momentum and angular momentum ?
 
Linear and angular momentum can't be summed up together as they have different units, so their mere sum won't make sense
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
617
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K