A Can Liquid Oxygen Be Used for Proton Breeding in Space via Neutron Activation?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sebastiaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxygen Proton
Sebastiaan
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Question, let's say I'm in space and I have acces to fast nuclear reactor and a lot of Liquid Oxygen, could I convert a decent portion of the neutron into Protons using Oxygen 16 Neutron activation? How effective would it be?

I found the following document on Oxygen neutron activation:

http://www.irpa.net/irpa1/cdrom/VOL.2/R2_7.PDF

Edit2: Alternatively, what If the LqdOxygen was used as a shield agains D-T fusion fast neutron
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
See Figure 9: If you have very high-energetic neutrons, you can get some 16O + n -> 16N + p reactions, but most of the time the neutrons will lose their energy before they do that. The protons will also have a lower energy, and you need the neutrons for tritium breeding in D-T-fusion.
Sebastiaan said:
Edit2: Alternatively, what If the LqdOxygen was used as a shield agains D-T fusion fast neutron
I would expect hydrogen to be a better shield, but everything that can scatter, slow or absorb neutrons acts as shielding.
 
Ok, I 'm trying to understand, but could you make me understand the Graphs and Tables better

At figure 9, in the left sifr of th graph we can see the letters "mb", does this stand for Cross section in micro barn ?

At figure 10 at column En = 14 MVe , what do the sub columns Emax and Rmax stand for?
 
Sebastiaan said:
At figure 9, in the left sifr of th graph we can see the letters "mb", does this stand for Cross section in micro barn ?
m=milli
µ=micro
Doesn't matter much as only relative values matter.
Sebastiaan said:
At figure 10 at column En = 14 MVe , what do the sub columns Emax and Rmax stand for?
The maximal energies and ranges of the emitted particles in living tissue, see the description below the table.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top