Can Macroscopic Objects Tunnel Through Walls According to Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Macroscopic objects have an extremely low probability of tunneling through walls according to quantum mechanics, making such events virtually impossible. The discussion references a personal anecdote about a sponge ball seemingly passing through a wall, but this is dismissed as a misunderstanding of quantum principles. The likelihood of macroscopic tunneling is compared to highly improbable scenarios, emphasizing that mathematical possibility does not equate to practical occurrence. Overall, the consensus is that such tunneling does not happen in reality. The conclusion reinforces that the observed event is not attributable to quantum mechanics.
Suyash Singh
ok i read about that quantum mechanics article about how macroscopic objects have a extremely low probability of passing through a wall.Now i very clearly remember that 5-6 years back i have noticed my smiley sponge ball going into a place it cannot go to.Do you think it may have gone through the wall ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suyash Singh said:
ok i read about that quantum mechanics article about how macroscopic objects have a extremely low probability of passing through a wall.Now i very clearly remember that 5-6 years back i have noticed my smiley sponge ball going into a place it cannot go to.Do you think it may have gone through the wall ?
No, I absolutely do not. The fact that something is mathematically possible does not mean it will happen. You misunderstand the concept, in this context, of "extremely low".
 
  • Like
Likes Suyash Singh and cnh1995
Extremely low as in Michael Jackson coming back from the dead and giving you the winning Powerball numbers for the next 10 drawings would be more likely. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes Suyash Singh, sophiecentaur and cnh1995
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top