Can measurements be made more precise then the measuring device?

mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Suppose there is a quantity X to be measured. To do this you have a measuring device with a resolution of 1 and an accuracy of +/-1. It is imediately obvious that repeated measurements can yield an accuracy of +/- 0.5 but can any greater certainty be achieved?

If 2 measurements are made and they are, for example 6 and 7, then it can be stated that 5<=X<=7 for the first measurement and 6<=X<=8 for the second so 6<=X<=7 so X=6.5 +/- 0.5. What if 10 measurements were made and 9 came up 6 but only 1 came up 7. Can it be stated with any degree of certainty that X is closer to 6 then to 7?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"An Introduction to Error Analysis" by John Taylor is a good book.

If you can characterize the error of the instrument, perhaps something more specific than it has an accuracy of +/-1, then averaging the measurements can give you significantly more accuracy. The book describes it all. If you are interested in this subject it should be a fascinating read.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top