Can measuring certain operators in a quantum system have deadly consequences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Count Iblis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables
Count Iblis
Messages
1,858
Reaction score
8
A variant of Schrödinger's cat experiment:
Consider operators with eigenstates of the form |dead> + |alive>. If we could somehow measure such an operator we could kill a healthy person by just observing. :smile:

So, what is going on here?
Consider a simpler problem: A particle in symmetric two well potential separated by a potential barrier inbetween. If we put the particle in the left well and measure the energy, the wavefunction will collapse to an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, which are symmetric or anti-symmetric linear combinations of the particle in the left and right well. So, if we measure the energy and then measure the position of the particle, the particle has 50% chance of moving from the left to the right well, regardless of how high the barrier in the middle is.

So, the measurement must involve a strong interaction with the particle. The higher the barrier is the more difficult it is to measure the Hamiltonian because the symmetric and anti-symmetric wavefunctions become almost degenerate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we could measure the observable you talked about, we would be putting the system into one of the 2 eigenstates - either |dead>+|alive> or |dead>-|alive>- now nobody knows the physical meaning these 2 states because nobody has ever measured an observable with the given operator, therefore we cannot really talk about being dead or alive. This is what i think...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top