Can Mosquitoes Develop Resistance to Repellants in Just Two Weeks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anubodh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    genetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the adaptation of mosquitoes, specifically Culex pipiens, to mosquito repellents. It emphasizes that adaptation varies by species and is influenced by genetic variation within populations rather than individual mosquitoes. The key point is that exposure to repellents can lead to natural selection, where mosquitoes less sensitive to the repellents have a reproductive advantage, ultimately increasing their prevalence in the population over generations. Significant genetic changes would require a large population of mosquitoes to ensure random mating and the spread of advantageous traits. The timeline for observable resistance development depends on the generation time of the mosquitoes, not on short-term exposure to repellents. Evolution occurs at the population level, making individual experiments ineffective in demonstrating resistance development.
anubodh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
How much time does it take for mosquitoes to adapt to a mosquito repellant?
I know it will vary greatly for different mosquito species but will there be any significant change in the genetic structure which can be measured if a mosquito (say culex pipens) is kept in the surroundings of very mild vapours of mosquito repellants for 2 weeks?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Also, if we find some change in the genetic structure how can we know will this change make the mosquito adapt better or make it more vulnerable to mosquito repallants?
 
anubodh said:
Also, if we find some change in the genetic structure how can we know will this change make the mosquito adapt better or make it more vulnerable to mosquito repallants?
The number of mosquitoes has to be large enough in your "environment" for them to mate each other randomly and repeatedly, which would increase the chance for the mutated genes to spread. Mutation for adaptation tends to be good for the species to grow but for others might reduce their chance to survive. My genetic teacher used to say so.
 
Can you or anyone else give a more specific answer?
Like how much mosquitoes? and for how much time they should be kept in such conditions (vapours of mosquito repellants) for the slightest change in their genetic structure?
 
You seem to misunderstand how evolution works. The use of mosquito repellant may induce the evolution of resistance to repellant, but not in the way you think. Mosquito repellant will not induce changes to the genetics of anyone individual mosquito. Rather, in an entire population of mosquitos, there will be a natural genetic variation in the individual mosquitos' sensitivity to the repellant. If mosquitos who are less sensitive to the repellant are more successful in breeding (for example, because they have easier access to human blood), then they will have more offspring than those with greater sensitivity to the repellant. Over time, mosquitos harboring the genes conferring the lowered sensitivity will begin to make up the majority of the population. Thus, the timescale for the spread of resistance depends on the generation time of the mosquitos.

Thus, in the experiment you propose, putting an individual mosquito in a jar of repellant and looking for the development of resistance in that individual, you will not see resistance evolve. Evolution occurs on populations, not individuals.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top