Can MRI Fringe Fields be Mapped in a 3D Space?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mapping of MRI machine fringe fields in a three-dimensional space. Participants explore measurement techniques, the assumptions of axisymmetry, and the challenges posed by the physical environment around the MRI machine. The scope includes technical aspects of measurement and the application of these measurements for navigation purposes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes measuring the fringe field in a plane parallel to the radius of the MRI machine and assuming axisymmetry to create a 3D map.
  • Another participant suggests using published field maps from manufacturers, noting that they provide detailed information, including field gradients.
  • A participant challenges the assumption of axisymmetry, pointing out that the MRI machine's design may introduce asymmetries, particularly due to structural elements in the room.
  • Some participants acknowledge that while the main field-producing elements are axisymmetric, deviations can occur due to external factors like ferrous materials in the environment.
  • There is a discussion about the efficiency of mapping, with one participant noting that setup time is significant, and more measurement points could improve accuracy.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on whether the original poster is asking about measuring the magnetic field or about making the planar measurement axisymmetric.
  • The original poster expresses the need for a high-resolution spatial measurement and discusses the limitations of simulations due to uncertainties in geometry and environmental factors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumption of axisymmetry and the best approach to mapping the fringe field. While some suggest using published data, others advocate for direct measurement, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal methodology.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of axisymmetry, the influence of environmental factors, and the challenges of achieving high-resolution measurements. There is also mention of the potential inaccuracies introduced by surrounding structures and equipment.

arashazizi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I am working on a project that require to have map of an MRI machine fringe field in 3d space. I basic idea is to measur it in one plane parallel to radius of machine and then by assuming that field is axissymetric make my map. does anybody have any idea on doing that or on my work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The manufacturers of MRI machines are required to publish various field maps in their official documentation. Why don't you just use the published maps?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Thanks, but they just publish safe zone around machine and in Cartesian plans. I am going to use fringe field for navigation purpose and I need to have a more exact map of magnetic field in proximity of machine. the gradient in this region is bigger than inside the machine and also we have more freedom there.
 
They publish quite detailed plots of the field, the field gradient, and sometimes other quantities also.

The distance of the 5 Gauss line is often published in the marketing material. I think that is what you are talking about, but the actual system documentation and manuals contain much more detailed maps.

Look for the MRI Compatibility Data portion of the manual.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Why would you think the fringe field is axisymmetric when the MIR machine is not - for example, it is supported on the bottom, but not on the top. Furthermore, if you are going to the trouble of measuring the field, why not measure it everywhere?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
The main field producing elements are axisymmetric, so it is a pretty good approximation. But you are right that there are slight deviations from axisymmetric. Particularly if the room has steel structural members.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Inside the bore, the symmetry is good. But outside, all bets are off. Particularly if there is little or no iron for the return flux (common in these magnets) and, like you say, something ferrous in the room.

If you've ever mapped a magnet, you'll know that the vast majority of the time is in setup. Once you get going, it's pretty quick - so more points is the way to go for sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
I do agree with that. I would either use the published plots or I would do a full mapping.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Your comments made my way more clear. I appreciate your guidance.
 
  • #10
arashazizi said:
Hello everybody, I am working on a project that require to have map of an MRI machine fringe field in 3d space. I basic idea is to measur it in one plane parallel to radius of machine and then by assuming that field is axissymetric make my map. does anybody have any idea on doing that or on my work?

I'm confused- are you asking how to measure the magnetic field in a plane, or are you asking how to make the planar measurement axisymmetric?
 
  • #11
My aim is to have a spatial measurement of fringe magnetic field in a 1^3 cubic space. If I want to have a 1 cm resolution I would have to take 10^3 measurement on exact points. I believe simulation does not work hear because geometry and all sources of uncertainty. I thought that if I take measures in a plane and then extend it to a cylindrical space I would have the map but distortion and lots of cables and other stuff around the machine make this assumption wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K