A Can Operator Theory Help Unify Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics4Funn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Physics4Funn
Messages
24
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
The mathematical operator view might be extended.
Maybe expand the number of operators to phenomena that haven't been considered.

What do you think about using operator theory to model spacetime?
1. In Newtonian physics, F = ma describes exactly describes mass m at an exact point x, a force F, and acceleration a by absolute and independent x and time t.

2. In quantum mechanics, physics moved to an energy description including a trade off between time and energy. There is uncertainty in the state and a tradeoff between location and movement.
Instead of just solving a differential equation, mathematics changed to an operator view and a Hilbert space for solutions.

3. Quantum Electrodynamics introduced special relativity so mass and energy, time and space are related. The operator view increased and was named Quantum Field Theory. Now operators also described charge, mass, rotation, and others.

4. General Relativity replaced force with spacetime geometry. But quantum field theory continued using the idea of gravitational force through mass and energy.

The newest concepts have been quantized. There are still some concepts that have not been quantized. Quantum states can be discrete and continuous.

The mathematical operator view might be extended.
Maybe expand the number of operators to phenomena that haven't been considered.

What do you think about using operator theory to model spacetime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This paper is new to me, but I know that this idea not new. Another scientist has been working along these lines since 2000. I can usually talk to grad students about new techniques for work beyond the standard model, but I have not found many working physicists willing to even discuss these approaches. The last time that I posted about this subject on Physics Forums I received no replies.

So what do think about the prospect quantizing more physics concepts? The math gets complex for all of the ideas about bringing theories together. I'm just wondering if this approach might be less weird than 11 dimensions or multiverses. Not that I am against other approaches. I'll accept any model that is verified in the lab.
 
I came across the following paper by Mir Faizal, Lawrence M Krauss, Arshid Shabir, and Francesco Marino from BC. Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything Abstract General relativity treats spacetime as dynamical and exhibits its breakdown at singularities‎. ‎This failure is interpreted as evidence that quantum gravity is not a theory formulated {within} spacetime; instead‎, ‎it must explain the very {emergence} of spacetime from deeper quantum degrees of...
How would one build mathematically an infinite number of spatial dimensions theory? I can concieve mathematically an n-th vector or ##\mathbb{R}^{\infty}##, I had done so in my Topology course back then. But obviously it's not empirically possible to test. But is a theory of everything ought to be "finite" and empirical? I mean obviously if there are only 4 interactions (currently known); but then again there could be more interactions around the corner. So to encompass it all seems to me...