Can Parametrized Plane Curves Have Constant Curvature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mandelbroth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a smooth plane curve parametrized by a parameter \( t \in I \) can only be a subset of either a circle \( S^1 \) or a straight line if the distance \( \|\sigma(t_1) - \sigma(t_0)\| \) depends solely on \( |t_1 - t_0| \). The participants explore the implications of the unit vector \( \hat n(t_0, t_1) \) being constant, leading to the conclusion that only circles and lines maintain constant curvature. The proof is established through the relationship between the distance function and the parametrization of the curve.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth functions and parametrization in calculus.
  • Familiarity with concepts of curvature in differential geometry.
  • Knowledge of vector notation and operations in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).
  • Basic principles of limits and continuity in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curvature in differential geometry.
  • Learn about the implications of constant curvature in plane curves.
  • Explore the relationship between parametrization and geometric shapes in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).
  • Investigate the role of unit vectors in defining direction and curvature.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus and differential geometry, and anyone interested in the properties of curves and their geometric implications.

Mandelbroth
Messages
610
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


Suppose ##\sigma:I\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2## is a smooth plane curve parametrized by a parameter ##t\in I##. Prove that if ##\|\sigma(t_1)-\sigma(t_0)\|## depends entirely on ##|t_1-t_0|##, then the image of ##I## under ##\sigma## is a subset of either ##S^1## or a line.

The Attempt at a Solution


Embarrassingly enough, I'm having trouble setting up a proof here. I understand intuitively why this is true, but I can't see where to start. Can someone just nudge me in the right direction?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mandelbroth said:

Homework Statement


Suppose ##\sigma:I\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2## is a smooth plane curve parametrized by a parameter ##t\in I##. Prove that if ##\|\sigma(t_1)-\sigma(t_0)\|## depends entirely on ##|t_1-t_0|##, then the image of ##I## under ##\sigma## is a subset of either ##S^1## or a line.

The Attempt at a Solution


Embarrassingly enough, I'm having trouble setting up a proof here. I understand intuitively why this is true, but I can't see where to start. Can someone just nudge me in the right direction?

Thank you.

Suppose \|\sigma(t_1) - \sigma(t_0)\| = f(|t_1 - t_0|) for some real-valued f such that f(t) \geq 0 for all t with f(0) = 0. Then
<br /> \sigma(t_1) = \sigma(t_0) + \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)\qquad(1)<br />
where \hat n is a unit vector. This can be rearranged to give
<br /> \sigma(t_0) = \sigma(t_1) - \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)<br />
and swapping t_0 and t_1 and comparing with (1) yields
\hat n(t_0, t_1) = -\hat n(t_1,t_0)

I don't know whether this will lead anywhere. However I do see that if \hat n is constant then \sigma(I) will be a line segment.

EDIT: It also occurs to me that circles and lines are the only plane curves of constant curvature.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
Suppose \|\sigma(t_1) - \sigma(t_0)\| = f(|t_1 - t_0|) for some real-valued f such that f(t) \geq 0 for all t with f(0) = 0. Then
<br /> \sigma(t_1) = \sigma(t_0) + \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)\qquad(1)<br />
where \hat n is a unit vector. This can be rearranged to give
<br /> \sigma(t_0) = \sigma(t_1) - \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)<br />
and swapping t_0 and t_1 and comparing with (1) yields
\hat n(t_0, t_1) = -\hat n(t_1,t_0)

I don't know whether this will lead anywhere. However I do see that if \hat n is constant then \sigma(I) will be a line segment.

EDIT: It also occurs to me that circles and lines are the only plane curves of constant curvature.
I realized that they are both the only plane curves with constant curvature, then I proceeded to cook up a proof.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K