Can Physics and Engineering Help Attenuate Sound in a Large Indoor Firing Range?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_Kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the engineering and physics considerations for attenuating sound in a large indoor firing range. Participants explore various design elements, materials, and configurations to minimize sound blast from rifle muzzles while addressing constraints such as room dimensions and environmental noise factors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the shape and treatment of the room's surfaces are crucial, emphasizing the use of anechoic materials for walls.
  • Another participant notes that limiting openings to the outside is important for muffling sound heard from outside, recommending baffling with anechoic material where openings exist.
  • Concerns are raised about the need to attenuate sound for shooters inside the range, with a focus on the design of the space to achieve this goal.
  • One participant mentions a setup involving shooting down a steel tube that appeared to attenuate sound effectively.
  • Another proposes the use of a rectangular "pipe" made of sound-absorbing material to further reduce noise during shooting.
  • Discussion includes the idea that the room's shape could be varied (e.g., standard rectangle, < sign, polygon, or corrugated) to enhance sound attenuation.
  • It is suggested that no two walls should be parallel to reduce standing waves, referencing techniques from recording studio design.
  • Participants discuss the potential use of sound deadening panels on walls and ceilings, with one proposing a corrugated ceiling design.
  • Concerns about fire hazards associated with ordinary foam rubber are raised, along with considerations for noise reduction coefficients and sound transmission coefficients for materials used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various ideas and suggestions regarding materials and design shapes, but there is no consensus on a single approach or solution. Multiple competing views and methods remain under consideration.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge physical constraints such as fixed room dimensions and the need for a bullet catch, which may limit design options. The discussion also highlights the importance of balancing sound attenuation with practical considerations for the firing range's operation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in acoustics, sound engineering, architectural design for specialized spaces, and those involved in creating indoor shooting ranges may find this discussion relevant.

Physics_Kid
Messages
172
Reaction score
11
i am looking for some ideas on where i can look within physics and engineering to help solve my problem.

i want to attenuate the sound blast from a rifle muzzle, however, i want to engineer a large deep room to do it. think of this like a indoor firing range. i know opera stages many times don't need amps and speakers so that the sound can reach the back of the room with little attenuation. my problem has some physical constraints that limit the max dimensions of the room. width is fixed at 153ft, depth(or length) is fixed at 300ft, height is 10ft(min), height and the interior surface profile can be adjusted. although the far end needs a bullet catch, the end wall can be, as example, open to the outdoors in some way to reduce sound pressure reflections.

just as example, wild ideas, etc
room.png
 
Science news on Phys.org
Physics_Kid said:
i am looking for some ideas on where i can look within physics and engineering to help solve my problem.

i want to attenuate the sound blast from a rifle muzzle, however, i want to engineer a large deep room to do it. think of this like a indoor firing range. i know opera stages many times don't need amps and speakers so that the sound can reach the back of the room with little attenuation. my problem has some physical constraints that limit the max dimensions of the room. width is fixed at 153ft, depth(or length) is fixed at 300ft, height is 10ft(min), height and the interior surface profile can be adjusted. although the far end needs a bullet catch, the end wall can be, as example, open to the outdoors in some way to reduce sound pressure reflections.

just as example, wild ideas, etc
View attachment 207782
More important that the shape of the room will be the material you use for the walls. You want something anechoic.
Google "anechoic materials" or "anechoic tiles" - both web and shopping.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
yeah, the surface shape and treatment is the ez part, but what about main design/shape? the floor must remain bare smooth concrete.
 
Physics_Kid said:
yeah, the surface shape and treatment is the ez part, but what about main design/shape? the floor must remain bare smooth concrete.
If you want to muffle the sound as heard from outside, you will need to limit openings to the outside. And where there are openings, they should be baffled with anechoic material. To muffle the sound for people inside the range, keep the ceiling low where you can - to minimize the problem with the floor. Of course, anyone inside will be wearing hearing protection.
 
its the sound of shooter(s) that needs to be attenuated. environmental (outside) noise is a factor. areas that may be open to the outside might be there to help release the sound pressure energy.

and yes, shooters inside would be wearing hearing protection, but the design of the space should be engineered to attenuate.

i have to go back and look again, i saw some other setups where a shooter with rifle shoots down a ~36"dia steel tube and the sound seemed to be very attenuated.
 
My question was who was being protected from the sound - not where the sound was coming from.

They can shoot through a 48"x24" (width x height) rectangular "pipe" made of sound absorbing material and it should be even better. And if they are shooting at target that are more horizontally distributed, they will have more room for motion.

The floor needs to be solid concrete, but can the target wall be anechoic?
 
attenuation of muzzle noise to help protect shooters and nearby folks. the room is connected to other rooms in the bldg. but in general, trying to attenuate as much as possible.

walls and ceiling can have sound deadening panels. the target wall is a bullet catch. tubes will not be feasibility, the lane dividers are made to adjust (slide&lock) on the floor for various types of training.

so what type of shape would the room be to help attenuate? just a std rectangle, a < sign, a polygon, corrugated, a < shape where the ceiling has a sin(x) ripple, etc ?
 
No two walls should be parallel. That reduces standing waves.
 
David Lewis said:
No two walls should be parallel. That reduces standing waves.

this is a method o know of from a recording studio design.

so, flat floor, ceiling that opens up like <, and then one side wall that comes in at an angle.

i am looking at a panel system for the ceiling that has end result like corrugation. then i plan to use sound deadening foam sheets to cover walls and ceiling.
 
  • #10
The anechoic panels I've seen have pyramid shapes molded into foam elastomer material. I believe ceiling and wall finish panels have a noise reduction coefficient (NRC) in dB, a flame spread rating (seasoned red oak = 100), and smoke developed rating. Ordinary foam rubber is a fire hazard.

If you are concerned with how much sound passes through the wall and gets outside, there is also a sound transmission coefficient (STC).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K