Can physics help improve your hockey skills?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blarginsnarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Improving hockey skills can be enhanced through an understanding of physics. Sharpening skates reduces friction, allowing for better control on the ice. Increasing the initial speed of a shot can lead to faster puck velocity, while extending the push on the puck with the stick maximizes acceleration. The type of stick blade, whether straight or curved, also affects puck speed and trajectory. These physics principles can significantly contribute to skill enhancement in hockey.
blarginsnarf
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Well, I have a project in which I have to relate hockey and basketball with physics(I've finished basketball). One of the questions are
"How can you improve your hockey skills?". I have to give THREE ideas on how to improve your skills and relate it to physics. At the moment I only have 1 which is:

Sharpening your skates before a game so that they won't be dull. If they're dull, the skates would undergo less kinetic and static friction to move therefore causing you to slide uncontrollably.

Does anyone have 2 other ideas?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How about shooting faster by starting with an initial speed toward the goal? Accelerating the puck more by extending the time and distance for which you push on it with the stick?
 
Thank you!
 
Is the shooter using a stick with straight or a curved blade? How can this impact the speed of the puck?
 
turbo said:
Is the shooter using a stick with straight or a curved blade? How can this impact the speed of the puck?

Wow, I never thought of that XD thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top