Can Planets Form Without Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TShock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Stars
AI Thread Summary
Research indicates that planets can form in systems without stars, such as in dark systems or around massive bodies like brown dwarfs. While traditional planet formation typically involves a star, oversized gas giants could theoretically exist in such environments. Rogue planets, which are not gravitationally bound to any star, also exemplify this phenomenon. Sub-brown dwarfs represent a category of planetary-mass objects formed from gas cloud collapse, lacking the mass to initiate nuclear fusion. Overall, while less common, the formation of planets without stars is a plausible scenario in astrophysics.
TShock
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
has anyone ever done research on the accretion of planets into a system without a star forming? Just a dark system. How likely is this to happen as opposed to a system forming with a star?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
..what would the planets orbit?
 
Central body can be massive, but it can be not massive enough to become a star. Like a brown dwarf (check wikipedia article). See also wiki entry on Cha 110913-773444.
 
As Borek noted, planet formation does not require a star. An oversized 'Jupiter' would be sufficient. I expect any such planets would, however, be small.
 
"David Bennett of the University of Notre Dame has discovered an extra-solar planet of about three Earth masses orbiting a star with a mass so low that its core may not be large enough to maintain nuclear reactions"

I noticed this on Science Daily this morning.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080602131105.htm
 
Wikipedia said:
A rogue planet is an object which has equivalent mass to a planet and is not gravitationally bound to any star, and that therefore moves through space as an independent object.

Sub-brown dwarf is a planetary-mass object whose mass is smaller than the low-mass cut-off for brown dwarfs (around 13 times the mass of Jupiter). Unlike proper brown dwarfs, they are not massive enough to fuse deuterium. Sub-brown dwarfs are formed in the manner of stars, through the collapse of a gas cloud, and not through accretion or core collapse from a circumstellar disc.
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstellar_planet"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-brown_dwarf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top