Can Power Be Transmitted via Radio Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thorguy57
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the feasibility of transmitting power through sound waves using two speakers. One speaker vibrates to create sound waves, which then cause a second speaker to vibrate, potentially generating voltage. While this concept is theoretically possible, it is clarified that the method described is akin to how microphones operate, rather than using radio waves. The practicality of using this method for large power transmission is questioned, though it may work for small-scale applications. Overall, the idea serves as a brainstorming exercise for understanding energy transfer through waves.
thorguy57
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok first off I am sorry because this probably isn't in the right section but didn't know where to put it. I have to come up with a report in one of my classes about power distribution. I am just curious if this would work theory wise. I am not going to make a working model or anything this is more just an assignment to learn how to brainstorm.
Ok so here it goes. Would it be possible to transmit small amounts of power through radio waves? My this I mean is it possible to have a speaker hooked up to an electrical source which cause the first speaker to vibrate back and forth rapidly (like a normal speaker does). You would then put another speaker in front of it. The pressure of the radio waves would then make the other speaker fluctuate back and forth and move a core back and forth through some windings to create a voltage. I would mount both speaker inside a closed, sealed bow to contain the sound waves. Would this be at all possible do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you describe (with the two speakers) is power transmitted through sound waves and not radio waves.
The speaker produces mechanical waves which are detected by the second one (acting like a microphone).

Regrading the original question, sure is possible. This is how radio and TV broadcasting work. The receiver gets a (very) little amount of power transmitted from the emission antenna through radio waves. Here the focus is not on the power per se, but the information contained in the radio wave. However the principle works.
However to transmit large power this way (as a substitute for power lines) is impractical for several reasons. It may be used though in some special cases.
 
Thanks for the quick response. Yes sound waves, sorry. I really should start proof reading before I submit. Like I said this is more just for a brainstorming thing. Maybe I will try and build one of these things just as a little experiment when I get bored. I wouldn't think it should be to hard. Just two speakers pointed at each other in a completely sealed plexiglass box. That way the pressure of the sound waves are directed directly at the other one. If I could get the one speaker to fluctuate the other one enough to build up a charge in a coil hooked to it and light an LED I would be happy. Thanks again.
 
As Nasu explained you would have energy (and thus power) transferred through sound waves, not radio waves. However I would like to point out that ALL waves move energy around. The very act of receiving a radio signal is a direct result of the radio waves transmitting energy into the antenna to move the electrons back and forth.

Also, your method of one speaker sending waves to another speaker is almost identical to the way a normal microphone works. The waves in the air cause a coil or other object to vibrate and generates a voltage in the circuit of the microphone which is amplified and sent to a speaker or recording device.

Take a look at the following link for more information on wireless power transmission.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transmission
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top