Can Relativistic Speeds Affect the Calculation of a System's Center of Mass?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
356
Reaction score
33
Consider a system of several point-masses separated by large distances and moving with relativistic speeds in relation to one another. GR says that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light. SR says that simultaneity often does not exist for such point-masses. Question: Is it possible to define a precise (although dynamic) center of mass for such a system? As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, such definitions exist. Pick a point z and a spacelike hyperplane S passing through that point. Let it be normal to a timelike vector n. Then define total linear and angular momenta by summing up individual particle momenta as they intersect S. This gives you tensor fields P^a(z,n) and S_{ab}(z,n) = S_{[ab]}.

There are now two nontrivial points to note. First, given any point z, there exists exactly one (up to normalization and sign) normal vector \bar{n}^a(z) such that
<br /> P^a(z,\bar{n}(z)) \propto \bar{n}^a(z) .<br /> [/itex]<br /> Second, there exists a unique worldline described by all possible z&#039;s satisfying<br /> &lt;br /&gt; P^a(z,\bar{n}) S_{ab} (z, \bar{n}) = 0.&lt;br /&gt;<br /> This is the center-of-mass. For normal matter, it is timelike and has other nice properties. In the absence of any radiation or external forces, the center-of-mass moves on a geodesic (straight line) in SR. Furthermore, the angular momentum tensor is parallel-transported along that geodesic. These results follows from energy and momentum conservation.<br /> <br /> In words, the definition I&#039;ve given states that the center-of-mass is where the system&#039;s mass dipole moment vanishes as viewed by an observer seeing zero 3-momentum. This is similar to what&#039;s done in Newtonian physics, although there are a number of additional subtleties that have to be considered in the relativistic case.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top