Can Saggital Motion Help Estimate Frontal Displacement in Treadmill Walking?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a research project analyzing treadmill walking by recording subjects from both frontal and sagittal planes. The researcher faces challenges with variable displacement of subjects on the treadmill, affecting the accuracy of measurements taken from a 10 cm calibration marker. Suggestions include using a fixed side marker to measure changes in size due to sagittal motion, which could help estimate frontal displacement. This method could provide a more accurate way to calculate center of mass displacement during walking. Overall, the focus is on improving measurement accuracy in biomechanics research.
btd
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,
I hope I am posting this under right topic.
I am running a research project and we are recording videos of subjects from both frontal (back) and saggital (side) plane while they are walking on the treadmill.
I put 10cm long calibration marker on the back of the subject. This way, when I analyze the video recording I can calculate how much center of mass displaced during walking. But the problem is subjects do not walk on the same spot on the treadmill all the time. They go front and back and this makes my 10 cm, 8cm or 12cm (estimation) on the recording
I am just wondering if I measure the displacement from saggital recording, can this help to calculate how much it makes change on 10 cm in frontal recording.

or is there a another way?
Thanks
Tanner
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I understand - you are looking at how much a marker between two body parts shrinks and grows as they move?.
Can you place another marker by the side of the first but make it fixed so that it only changes size because of the saggital motion?
Then you simply divide one measurement by the other.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top