Can someone explain mass energy conservation?

AI Thread Summary
Mass-energy conservation states that mass and energy are interchangeable, as illustrated by nuclear fusion, where combined masses yield energy. The discussion highlights confusion regarding how gaining energy, such as potential energy while ascending in a lift, appears to increase mass. It clarifies that this perceived increase in mass is related to the work done to change energy states, aligning with the work-energy theorem. The conversation emphasizes that both special and general relativity explain these mass-energy relationships. Understanding these principles resolves the confusion about energy contributing to mass without implying the creation of matter.
matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
Im confused with mass energy conservation. i get that mass and energy are conserved but i don't understand how mass can become energy and visa versa.. can anyone help explain it to me in another way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

matt_crouch said:
Im confused with mass energy conservation. i get that mass and energy are conserved but i don't understand how mass can become energy and visa versa.. can anyone help explain it to me in another way?

Hi matt_crouch! Welcome to PF! :smile:

An example: in nuclear fusion, two masses combine to a lesser mass and give off energy.

The mass-plus-energy is the same before as after. :smile:
 
But what i find confussing is how can someone get heavier as they gain energy. for example someone going up in a lift gains potential energy and mass?

are they gaining matter? or can energy be matter.. if u see what I am getting it. how can a gain in energy cause a gain in kilograms.

im probably just makeing it more confusing =]
 
The work-energy theorem still applies …

the special relativistic increase in mass due to velocity is balanced by the work done in increasing the speed

and the general relativistic increase in mass due to lower gravitational potential is balanced by the work done by gravity. :smile:
 
ahh ok i get it.. i think cheers for the help :D
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top