Can someone help me understand as well as validate this article

[HankDorsett]

TL;DR

Validating an article

Can someone take a look at this article and first confirm its accuracy and if it is accurate help me understand it a bit more?

https://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html

 

[Demystifier]

Yet another example of delayed choice experiments, which are often incorrectly interpreted as a change of the past.

 

[PeroK]

Summary: Validating an article

Can someone take a look at this article and first confirm its accuracy and if it is accurate help me understand it a bit more?

https://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html

That's journalism rather than science.

 

[HankDorsett]

That's journalism rather than science.

 

[HankDorsett]

Try this again.

Thanks for both of your responses. Although I have no understanding of the quantum world I found it hard to believe.

Yet another reason why I love this forum.

 

[PeroK]

Try this again.

Thanks for both of your responses. Although I have no understanding of the quantum world I found it hard to believe.

Yet another reason why I love this forum.

Try this instead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser

 

[PeroK]

Try this again.

Thanks for both of your responses. Although I have no understanding of the quantum world I found it hard to believe.

Yet another reason why I love this forum.

By coincidence:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/delayed-choice-quantum-eraser-experiment.976854/

 

[Demystifier]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser

In particular, it says:
"If a photon in flight is interpreted as being in a so-called "superposition of states", i.e. if it is interpreted as something that has the potentiality to manifest as a particle or wave, but during its time in flight is neither, then there is no time paradox. This is the standard view, and recent experiments have supported it."