HankDorsett said:Summary: Validating an article
Can someone take a look at this article and first confirm its accuracy and if it is accurate help me understand it a bit more?
https://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html
PeroK said:That's journalism rather than science.
HankDorsett said:Try this again.
Thanks for both of your responses. Although I have no understanding of the quantum world I found it hard to believe.
Yet another reason why I love this forum.
HankDorsett said:Try this again.
Thanks for both of your responses. Although I have no understanding of the quantum world I found it hard to believe.
Yet another reason why I love this forum.
In particular, it says:PeroK said:
Understanding an article means being able to comprehend the information presented and the main ideas and arguments presented by the author. Validating an article means critically evaluating the information and determining its accuracy and reliability.
Someone can help you understand and validate an article by discussing the main ideas and arguments with you, providing additional resources or explanations, and asking questions to help you think critically about the information presented.
Understanding and validating an article is important because it allows you to determine the credibility and accuracy of the information presented. This is especially important in scientific research, as it helps to ensure that the conclusions drawn from the article are reliable.
Some strategies for understanding and validating an article include reading the article critically, checking the sources and references cited, evaluating the author's credentials and biases, and discussing the article with others.
Yes, understanding and validating an article can be subjective to some extent. However, by using critical thinking skills and evaluating the evidence presented, one can minimize the subjectivity and make a more objective assessment of the article.