Can String Theory Be Tested Through Vibrations in a Vacuum?

Alex Foyeur
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
String Theory is basically the idea involving an indefinite amount of invisible "strings" vibrating at a large spectrum of frequencies, thus creating sub-atomic particles that compose everything we experience and ourselves. It would make sense if you could test this theory by creating something with sound that can be felt (i.e. a wall of sound that can be physically felt). But with string theory would something need to vibrate? Without oxygen which vibrates for sound, would string theory apply in a vacuum? Can we attribute that vibration to dark matter? These strings would have to tear themselves apart to create anything (conservation of mass taken into account, of course), unless they were moving dark matter. Then that leaves the question of dark matter. I'm curious to know if the data CERN collected with its Hadron Collider will be able answer anything on dark matter. Give me your opinions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alex Foyeur said:
String Theory is basically the idea involving an indefinite amount of invisible "strings" vibrating at a large spectrum of frequencies, thus creating sub-atomic particles that compose everything we experience and ourselves. It would make sense if you could test this theory by creating something with sound that can be felt (i.e. a wall of sound that can be physically felt). But with string theory would something need to vibrate? Without oxygen which vibrates for sound, would string theory apply in a vacuum? Can we attribute that vibration to dark matter? These strings would have to tear themselves apart to create anything (conservation of mass taken into account, of course), unless they were moving dark matter. Then that leaves the question of dark matter. I'm curious to know if the data CERN collected with its Hadron Collider will be able answer anything on dark matter. Give me your opinions.

Is it feasible that we can observe strings due to their vibrational qualities? I think this is what you're trying to ask.

In any case, CERN will never directly observe strings, the energy levels (distances) that string theory becomes observable at is far larger then what energies we're looking at with certain. I'm talking about around 18 orders of magnitude smaller.

"Sound" is a longitudinal wave that consists of the transport of energy due to the compression and contraction of groups of air molecules (oscillation). This won't be an observational pursuit for many reasons:

1. A string cannot vibrate anything to create sound since there is "nothing" around it
2. The energy of the strings vibration is far to small to constitute any classical effects.
3. Our instruments aren't precise enough to observe the stringy characteristics of particles.
4. Touching on the above point, the quantized energy of a string is discrete and very small. It would hardly be noticable in comparison to the mess of anti-pair annihilations occurring in the vacuum.

Yes, string theory still holds in the vacuum since the dynamics of it's vibration are governed by basic principles i.e \alpha' (the string tension).

In principle, the dark matter we observe must also be strings.
 
Or in other words, strings are to sound like what protons and electrons are to tidal waves. There at the fundamental level, but completely irrelevant for all practical purposes.
 
The experiment suggested did not imply detecting strings directly, but to see if using vibrations in a vacuum can be Physically detected.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top