Can Sun Radiation Penetrate Earth's Crust and Alter Rock Composition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YADA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino
YADA
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I just watched the movie 2012. Now I know it's just a movie and a bit of fantasy.

What I want to know is, is there any type of radiation from the Sun that can penetrate a few miles into the Earth's crust and have some sort of effect on the rock down there. For example, can the amount of radiation in a rock be slowly increased over time only from radiation coming from the Sun? Do neutrinos become trapped in rock a few miles under ground and become detectable?

Thanks for any answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neutrinos go through the Earth easily
only a very small percentage of them are stopped by the rock

they aren't trapped as such - they are absorbed by an atom and have an effect, changing the atom
 
Thanks mgb_phys. I read somewhere that the amount of solar neutrinos hitting the side of the Earth facing the Sun are about the same as those being detected on the far side of the Earth. Thanks heaps for the non-technical answer.

Does the change in the atom change its radioactivity?
 
Depends on the atom and the energy of the neutrino (they have a wide spectrum).

Generally speaking, even if every single solar neutrino that hit the Earth were to be absorbed, it would take many billions of years to have any appreciable effect on Earth's composition.
 
Thanks hamster143. I think I can consider my questions answered. Thanks to both of you.
 
YADA said:
Thanks mgb_phys. I read somewhere that the amount of solar neutrinos hitting the side of the Earth facing the Sun are about the same as those being detected on the far side of the Earth.
correct, there about 50-100,000,000,000 neutrinos per cm^2 per second going through the earth.
The biggest detector is equivalent to 50,000 tons of rock and only detects 100 per year !11

Does the change in the atom change its radioactivity?
they interact with only a very few types of unstable atoms to change them - they don't have much effect on normal atoms.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top