Can Supercritical Helium Create Perpetual Motion at Subzero Temperatures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid
AI Thread Summary
Helium becomes a supercritical fluid at around 4-5 degrees near subzero, exhibiting zero viscosity and climbing the walls of its container. Some participants express skepticism about using this phenomenon for perpetual motion machines, while others argue that the fluid's movement is due to intermolecular repulsions rather than an external force. The discussion also touches on the idea that if a system were designed to allow continuous flow, the energy of the fluid would decrease over time, potentially lowering its temperature further. However, the concept of perpetual motion remains largely dismissed as impossible. The conversation highlights the intriguing properties of supercritical helium and the challenges of harnessing them for practical applications.
rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
I saw a video on youtube or somewhere which showed that Helium somewhere around 4-5 degrees near Subzero, becomes a supercritical fluid i.e. it has 0 viscosity. And the video showed that the liquid was coming out of the glass by climbing up the walls.

I'm pretty surprised by this.. and some people said that this could be used to make perpetual motion machines, which, however I am totally against [I'd rather believe in a Flying Spaghetti Monster].

so, if the fluid is to climb by itself, it needs a force that counteracts gravity. And that force purely will act, as the glass or the container walls cease to apply any force on the fluid. As such, I think that the force is caused by inter-molecular repulsions.

However, if we build something like a perpetual motion machine [not exactly perpetual], and the fluid continuously flows up and down. Then owing to work done by inner charges, the energy of the fluid must decrease after successive flows.

In that case, the temperature of the fluid must decrease. If we continue to do it, maybe at a point, the temperature may near sub zero. We might be able to reach the lowest temperatures ever.

What are your views on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rohanprabhu said:
I saw a video on youtube or somewhere which showed that Helium somewhere around 4-5 degrees near Subzero, becomes a supercritical fluid i.e. it has 0 viscosity. And the video showed that the liquid was coming out of the glass by climbing up the walls.

I'm pretty surprised by this.. and some people said that this could be used to make perpetual motion machines, which, however I am totally against

I am *for* them. Unfortunately, they can not exist.

[I'd rather believe in a Flying Spaghetti Monster].

so, if the fluid is to climb by itself, it needs a force that counteracts gravity.

No. A gas will also "climb out" of a container. There is no "extra" force causing this to happen. etc.

And that force purely will act, as the glass or the container walls cease to apply any force on the fluid. As such, I think that the force is caused by inter-molecular repulsions.

However, if we build something like a perpetual motion machine [not exactly perpetual], and the fluid continuously flows up and down. Then owing to work done by inner charges, the energy of the fluid must decrease after successive flows.

In that case, the temperature of the fluid must decrease. If we continue to do it, maybe at a point, the temperature may near sub zero. We might be able to reach the lowest temperatures ever.

What are your views on this?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top