Can Swift Fuel Revolutionize the Aviation Industry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NOideaWHATimDOING
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Swift Fuel has demonstrated significant advancements in aviation fuel, passing all specifications of the ASTM D-910 test, unlike any previous biofuels. It offers a 25% performance increase over petroleum, a 24% reduction in emissions, and a 30-degree lower freeze point, with no sulfates, petroleum, alcohol, or ethanol. The fuel's composition utilizes lower average carbon number components, aiming to reduce carbon output while maintaining engine performance standards. Purdue University's team, led by John Rusek, is poised to attract federal interest and is preparing to present findings to the Department of Energy. This development represents a potential evolution in liquid fuels, moving beyond traditional petroleum-based options.
NOideaWHATimDOING
[swiftenterprises.com/swiftdevelopment

This group from Purdue University was invited to present their data to the ASTM D-2 board on April 28th in Alexandria, VA

Director of the FAA stated that NO bio fuel has ever passed 1/2 of the specs on the D-910 test for 100LL general aviation fuel. This Swift fuel has passed 44 of 44.

New fuel showing lab and application testing 25% increase over petroleum

Shows a reduction of 24% in emissions
Shows a 30 degree lower freeze point
Has no Sulfates
No Petroleum
No Alcohol
No Ethanol
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I hope they tell ASTM what exactly they use, because simply telling what it is not does not faciliate a discussion.

We use lower average carbon number components than conventional petroleum and hence reduce the carbon output.
If it has less carbon atoms than gasoline and is not ethanol, it doesn't leave much to choose from. That leaves propane through heptane, and their various derivatives.
 
Agreed, the Carbon make up is not using Heptane or Pentane. Iso Pentane maybe a small amount. The trick they said was getting the Reid Vapor to regsiter and not drop the MON below 100 while keeping a lubricity level high enough to run in the Engines.

The findings are all they will leave with the ASTM. The rest would require an NDA like I had to sign to see this. Supposedly this would require a retro fit of an existing ABE or Ethanol plant to produce. Though they state that the plants should see a doubling effect for every pound of bio mass.

This is not advertising, this is a group that is about to get massive interest from the federal govt. (meeting with the DoE on Friday)

This is not for sale in any case. This is the next evolution of liquid fuels that is stepping beyond the "old guard" petroleum values.


This group @ Purdue was founded by John Rusek, PHd Chemical Engineering. He has worked with DARPA, Air Force and still contracts to the Navy.

I thought this thread would be informative vs. the normal questions I've seen on this site from people who think you can run a car on water only. This is a real solution. This is an evolutionary step that doesn't have the words "Green space" "ethanol" or a plethora of other catch phrases that are over used.

Beyond that, I'd think that most of the super intelligent members of this sight might be able to shed some more light on this new development. Help separate this from the din of PR work on E85 and the like.

NOTHING TO SELL, it's not in production for at least a year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top