Can tensors always commute with each other or are there exceptions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the commutation properties of tensors, particularly focusing on whether the metric tensor and other tensors always commute with each other. Participants explore the implications of tensor components versus tensor objects and provide examples to illustrate their points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the relation \( g_{ab}g_{cd} = g_{cd}g_{ab} \) holds for an arbitrary metric tensor and attempts to derive it using partial derivatives.
  • Another participant asserts that since \( g_{ab} \) and \( g_{cd} \) are numbers, they commute, providing examples of specific values for the metric components.
  • A later reply clarifies that the commutation relation applies to tensor components, but raises the point that tensor objects themselves may not necessarily commute.
  • Another participant provides an example of non-commuting tensor objects using Dirac matrices, indicating that tensors can exhibit non-commuting behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the commutation of tensor objects versus tensor components, indicating that there is no consensus on the general commutation properties of tensors.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the distinction between tensor components and tensor objects, highlighting the potential for confusion in their commutation properties. The discussion does not resolve the conditions under which tensors may or may not commute.

emma83
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am still having a hard time with tensors...
The answer is probably obvious, but is it always the case (for an arbitrary metric tensor [tex]g_{\mu \nu}[/tex] that [tex]g_{ab}g_{cd}=g_{cd}g_{ab}[/tex] ?

I was trying to find a formal proof for that, and was wondering if we could use the relations:
(1) [tex]g_{ab}=\frac{\partial x^{c}}{\partial x^{a}} \frac{\partial x^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} g_{cd}[/tex]
(2) [tex]g_{cd}=\frac{\partial x^{a}}{\partial x^{c}} \frac{\partial x^{b}}{\partial x^{d}} g_{ab}[/tex]

And then multiply the left-hand side of (1) and (2) together and use the fact that the fractions of partial derivatives commute with the metric tensor and cancel each other to get:
[tex]g_{ab}g_{cd}<br /> =(\frac{\partial x^{c}}{\partial x^{a}} \frac{\partial x^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} g_{cd}) (\frac{\partial x^{a}}{\partial x^{c}} \frac{\partial x^{b}}{\partial x^{d}} g_{ab})<br /> = \frac{\partial x^{c}}{\partial x^{a}}\frac{\partial x^{a}}{\partial x^{c}} \frac{\partial x^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} \frac{\partial x^{b}}{\partial x^{d}} g_{cd} g_{ab}<br /> = g_{cd}g_{ab}[/tex]

Does that make sense ?!

Thanks for your help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in

[tex] g_{ab}g_{cd}=g_{cd}g_{ab}[/tex]

[itex]g_{ab}[/itex] is just a number, and so is [itex]g_{cd}[/itex], and numbers commute.

for instance, [itex]g_{02} = 0[/itex], [itex]g_{00} = 1[/itex] (or [itex]g_{00} = -1[/itex]) depending on which your original definition of metric is)
 
Argh! Thanks a lot, again I mixed up "tensors" with "tensor components"...
So the commutation relation I wrote holds for the tensor components of any tensor (not only the metric), doesn't it ?

On the other hand, the tensor (objects) do not necessarily commute with each other, right ?
 
no the tensor objects can be non-commuting things like matricies, e.g.

[tex]\sigma ^{\mu \nu} = \frac{i}{2}[\gamma ^\mu, \gamma^\nu][/tex]
where the gamma's are dirac 4x4 matricies
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K