Can the Algebraic Result of a Dot Product be Applied to Vectors?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of algebraic results to vector dot products, specifically examining the equivalence of expressions involving vectors u and v. The participant confirms that the expression (u − v) • (u − v) simplifies to u•u − 2u•v + v•v, aligning with the algebraic identity a^2 − 2ab + b^2. Additionally, it clarifies that the dot product u•u is equivalent to the square of the magnitude |u|^2, which is derived similarly to the Pythagorean Theorem. The participant references a Wiki page for a detailed proof of the geometric interpretation of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the dot product and its properties
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean Theorem
  • Basic grasp of the Law of Cosines
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of the dot product in vector spaces
  • Learn about the Law of Cosines and its application in vector mathematics
  • Explore the properties of vector magnitudes and their relationship to dot products
  • Review algebraic identities and their proofs in the context of linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying linear algebra or vector calculus who seeks to deepen their understanding of vector operations and their algebraic properties.

veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Could someone please take a look at my attached work?

10. Given a vector u, the familiar absolute-value notation |u| is often used for its magnitude. Thus the expressions u•u and |u|^2 both mean the same thing. What exactly do they mean?11. For any two numbers a and b, the product of a−b times itself is equal to a^2−2ab+b^2. Does this familiar algebraic result hold for dot products of a vector u − v with itself? In other words, is it true that (u − v) • (u − v) = u•u−2u•v+v•v? Justify your conclusion, trying not to express vectors u and v in component form.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the difference in #10 between u*u and |u|^2 is that u*u is a dot product and |u| is the magnitude of u which is calculated similarly to the Pythagorean Theorem but allowing for more elements. Only using words I would say this shows that the dot product of vector u is equal to the square of the magnitude of vector u.

For #11 see this Wiki page and find the category heading "Proof of the geometric interpretation". This properly is fully derived and explained step by step starting with the Law of Cosines.

I hope this helps. Both of these properties are discussed in detail on many math sites, including the Wikipedia page I linked to in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K