MHB Can the Algebraic Result of a Dot Product be Applied to Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Could someone please take a look at my attached work?

10. Given a vector u, the familiar absolute-value notation |u| is often used for its magnitude. Thus the expressions u•u and |u|^2 both mean the same thing. What exactly do they mean?11. For any two numbers a and b, the product of a−b times itself is equal to a^2−2ab+b^2. Does this familiar algebraic result hold for dot products of a vector u − v with itself? In other words, is it true that (u − v) • (u − v) = u•u−2u•v+v•v? Justify your conclusion, trying not to express vectors u and v in component form.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe the difference in #10 between u*u and |u|^2 is that u*u is a dot product and |u| is the magnitude of u which is calculated similarly to the Pythagorean Theorem but allowing for more elements. Only using words I would say this shows that the dot product of vector u is equal to the square of the magnitude of vector u.

For #11 see this Wiki page and find the category heading "Proof of the geometric interpretation". This properly is fully derived and explained step by step starting with the Law of Cosines.

I hope this helps. Both of these properties are discussed in detail on many math sites, including the Wikipedia page I linked to in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top