MHB Can the Algebraic Result of a Dot Product be Applied to Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the dot product of vectors and their magnitudes. It clarifies that the expression u•u is equivalent to the square of the magnitude |u|^2, emphasizing that both represent the same concept. The inquiry also explores whether the algebraic identity (u − v) • (u − v) = u•u − 2u•v + v•v holds true for dot products, suggesting a connection to the Law of Cosines for justification. The participant references a Wikipedia page for a detailed geometric interpretation of this relationship. Overall, the thread highlights the fundamental properties of dot products and their geometric implications in vector mathematics.
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Could someone please take a look at my attached work?

10. Given a vector u, the familiar absolute-value notation |u| is often used for its magnitude. Thus the expressions u•u and |u|^2 both mean the same thing. What exactly do they mean?11. For any two numbers a and b, the product of a−b times itself is equal to a^2−2ab+b^2. Does this familiar algebraic result hold for dot products of a vector u − v with itself? In other words, is it true that (u − v) • (u − v) = u•u−2u•v+v•v? Justify your conclusion, trying not to express vectors u and v in component form.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe the difference in #10 between u*u and |u|^2 is that u*u is a dot product and |u| is the magnitude of u which is calculated similarly to the Pythagorean Theorem but allowing for more elements. Only using words I would say this shows that the dot product of vector u is equal to the square of the magnitude of vector u.

For #11 see this Wiki page and find the category heading "Proof of the geometric interpretation". This properly is fully derived and explained step by step starting with the Law of Cosines.

I hope this helps. Both of these properties are discussed in detail on many math sites, including the Wikipedia page I linked to in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Thank you!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top