Can the angular wave number(k) or frequency(w) be negative?

Click For Summary
The discussion addresses whether the angular wave number (k) and angular frequency (ω) can be negative in the context of a wave function. It clarifies that both k and ω are inherently positive, as they are defined by the wavelength (λ) and frequency (f), which are also positive values. The signs in the wave function indicate the direction of wave propagation, with opposite signs for kx and ωt indicating movement toward positive x. The conversation emphasizes that while k and ω can be expressed with different signs in the wave equation, they do not become negative. Overall, the key takeaway is that k and ω remain positive by definition, regardless of how the wave function is expressed.
Ethan Godden
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
1.Homework Statement

The wave function for a wave on a taunt string is:

y(x,t)=(0.350)(sin(10(π)(t)-3(pi)(x) +(π)/4)

where x and y are in meters and t is in seconds. If the linear mass density(μ) of the string is 75.0g/m, (a) what is tha average rate at which energy is transmitted along the string(P)? (b) What is the energy contained in each cycle of the wave?

Homework Equations


General Wave Function: (A)(sin(kx-ωt))
P=(1/2)(μ)(ω2)(A2)(v)
Eλ=(1/2)(μ)(ω2)(A2)(λ)
k=(2π)/λ
ω=(2π)f
v=λf

The Attempt at a Solution


My main question has to do with whether the angular wave number and/or the angular frequency can be negative. I am comparing the general wave function given in my textbook and the function given in the question, and the variables have different signs such as the "kx" be positive in the general function and negative in the question or the "ωt" being negative in the general function and positive in the question.

My first thought was that maybe the wave in this question is moving to the left as the general wave function changes to "(A)(sin(kx+ωt))" if this is the case, but when I did a bit of searching online, people said the wave is moving to the right. I am perplexed to how one can determine this.

I am pretty sure that whether k and ω are negative for this question does not matter because both would have the same sign as my solution below shows. I am just interested to know why k and ω are not negative and how one could determine the direction of motion for the wave from the quesiton.

Solution:

(a) k=(2π)/λ →λ=(2π/k) →λ=(2π)/(±3π)=±0.6666...rad/m
ω=(2π)f → ω/(2π)=f → ±(10π)/(2π)=±5Hz
v=λf → v=(±5)(±0.6666...)=3.33333...m/s

Input these values into the equation for P to get the average rate at which the energy is transmitted.

(b) Input the values into the equation for Eλ to find the energy contained in each cycle.

Also, if you wouldn't mind, please tell me if I am using this site correctly as this is my first post.

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
You did a great job using the template in posting your question. :smile:

##k## and ##\omega## are both positive numbers.

Note that ##\sin \left( kx-\omega t \right) = \sin \left(-(\omega t -kx) \right) = -\sin \left(\omega t -kx \right) = \sin \left(\omega t -kx +\pi \right) ##

So, ##\sin \left( kx-\omega t \right)## represents the same wave as ##\sin \left( \omega t - kx \right)## except for a difference of ##\pi## in the phase angle. Both ways of writing it represent a wave traveling toward positive x.

If ##kx## and ##\omega t## have opposite sign, the wave travels toward positive x.
If ##kx## and ##\omega t## have the same sign, the wave travels toward negative x.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
Thank you for you response,

I have a follow-up question about this.

Since ω=(2π)f and k=(2π)/λ, does this mean f and λ can be negative?

Thank you,
 
No. Since k and ω are positive, so are f and λ. All of these are positive "by definition".
 
Okay,

To clarify, the positive and negative signs in the function, whatever ever way we chose to write the function, just signal direction and have no association with the variables such as k and ω because they are by definition positive?
 
Ethan Godden said:
Okay,

To clarify, the positive and negative signs in the function, whatever ever way we chose to write the function, just signal direction and have no association with the variables such as k and ω because they are by definition positive?
Yes, that's right.

If you go on to study waves propagating in two or three dimension of space, then you will find that k can become a vector quantity. Its x, y, or z components can then be negative. But that's another story. Even in that case, the quantities λ, f, and ω remain positive by definition.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K