Can the dipole of speed explain the connection between weak and strong forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vlamir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential connection between weak and strong forces through the concept of a dipole of speed, suggesting that traditional assumptions may lead to improbable conclusions. The author proposes using vibrant rings as a model for understanding interactions of different energy streams, emphasizing that natural forces do not exhibit breaks or ruptures. They introduce the idea of "curvature of speed" to explain gravitational effects and suggest that mass can be related to acceleration measurements. The conversation also touches on the implications of the speed of light and vector velocity addition in experimental contexts, particularly regarding the behavior of charged particles. Overall, the discussion aims to provide a clearer framework for understanding complex physical phenomena.
vlamir
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Attempts to find logical link between weak forces of a long-range interaction and strong forces of a short-range interaction reduce us in the most improbable suppositions.
In my opinion, one of such suppositions (see attached file) can be tested by an experimental way.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, one of such suppositions (see attached file) can be tested by an experimental way.

Unfortunately I don't see any attached file vlamir.
 
Originally posted by Astrophysics
Unfortunately I don't see any attached file vlamir.
As I know, the administration of PF attaches files later.
Apparently, it is necessary some time for their check and processing.
 
I shall utilize vibrant rings, as the primary model of interaction of streams of different energy. In a nature there are no broken forces and broken streams of energy. There are divergent and concurrent streams, but broken streams are not present. Only in our mathematical fictions there are ruptures and boundary conditions, therefore we frequently appear unable to understand and to explain this or that phenomenon of a nature.
As prolongation of the theme I offer the task about electrical and magnetic interaction between rings both model of annihilation of electron and positron.

See attached files: em_interaction.doc and annihilation.doc
 

Attachments

Last edited:
In an electromagnetic wave the amplitude of a magnetic field lags behind amplitude of an electric field in 1/4 of period. Look at fig.2 in attached file " the dipole of speed ". In points A and B the changes of speed coincide in time, but spatially they are divided and, besides, these changes of speed have opposite signs.
The amplitude of radial oscillations in a point C also coincides in time with amplitude of tangential oscillations in points A and B, but in space they are biased in the same 1/4 of period.
I shall allow myself to put forward the supposition that the radial amplitude is attribute of the electrical component of electromagnetic field, then, accordingly, the axial amplitude should be attributed to magnetic component.
In attachment "em_interaction" the formulas and graph are shown which confirm, that the closed electrical and magnetic compositions can be joined and exist together. The external force is necessary for their connection, which would rotate vectors of fields in the necessary direction. The formulas (1) and (2) are classical, in too time they do not contradict a quantum mechanics. These formulas speak that the rings vibrate at very high frequencies, i.e. on length of a ring many tens (maybe thousands) of half-waves can be located.
The task of gravitation and mass is more complicated. This task is bound up with curvature. If to enter concept " curvature of speed ", it will mean radial acceleration. The mass, as is known, is determined by means of measurement of acceleration.
Some calculations we have fulfilled, but as yet we cannot plainly explain outcomes.
I hope, that the offered method is more visual and clear, than official paradigm, and will help inquisitive minds at solving of mysteries of the nature.
 
As I mentioned above, our attempts to explain gravitation with the help of radial acceleration have reduced in rather strange deductions. This strangeness consists in that, the Einstein's dependence of a mass on speed and deceleration of time it is possible to explain with the help of a vector velocity addition.
The speed of light in vacuum is constant. Experimental confirmation to this is the longitudinal Doppler effect.
In our model we have assumed a condition, that the longitudinal speed of energy in ring c' is equal also to speed of light c.
Let's research moving of the ring from the point of view of the stationary observer.
Apparently, that the ring can move rectilinearly only in the case when the axis of the ring is parallel to the direction of moving. In this case, according to a rule of addition of vectors, the speed c'^2=c^2-v^2, where v - speed of running away of the ring from the observer.
The rule of the vector velocity addition operates in all points of the ring equally and, as outcome it, we can watch in experiment the transversal Doppler effect.
If the axis of the ring to tilt on some angle to the direction of moving (for example, with the help of magnetic field), in two opposite halves of ring arises unbalance of speeds. In one half of ring the vector velocity addition yields the sign "+", in other half - sign "–".
Therefore, we again have the dipole of speed, but dipole of other sort. In experiment this dipole appears, as moving of charged particles in a curved trajectory.
The reduced speculative analysis, speaks that the observer cannot "see" the ring in experiment, if the speed of the ring becomes of equal speed of light.
This transition can be interpreted as a stopping of time inside of particle moved with speed of light, and as transformation of the gravitational mass of unmovable particle into "invisible mass" of moved particle, i.e. into energy.
On the other hand, it is possible to interpret transition of mass into energy as inversion of space - time or as inversion of the dipole of speed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top