Can the Dirac Delta Impulse be eliminated in this differential equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Not_a_Sheldon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse
Not_a_Sheldon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey experts,

I have the following differential equation with an impulse described by the Dirac delta function

dx/dt (t) = - a⋅x(t) + d⋅delta(t) x(0)=0

with a,d scalars. My problem is this delta function in the right hand side.

Is there an equivalent formulation without the delta function, e.g. putting the d into the initial value?

How could I solve this numerically, e.g. in Matlab?

Many thanks for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "delta function" is defined in terms of its integral properties so we want to be able to write a solution in terms of an integral. This is a linear equation so it is easy to find an "integrating factor". Write the equation as dx/dt+ ax= \delta(t). We want to find a function u(t) such that multiplying by it, to get u dx/dt+ axu, gives an "exact derivative", d(ux)/dt. Of course, d(ux)/dt= u(dx/dt)+ (du/dt)x so, setting those equal, u(dx/dt}+ (du/dt)x= u (dx/dt)+ axu, we must have (du/dx)x= axu or just du/dt= au which has u= e^{at} as a solution.

That is, our equation is just e^{at}(dx/dt)+ axe^{at}= d(e^{at}x)/dt= e^{at}\delta(t) and we solve by integrating both sides, integrating from negative infinity to t:
The integral of e^{at}\delta(t) is 0 if the integration does not include 0, e^{a(0)}= 1 if it does. e^{at}x(t)= C or x(t)= Ce^{-at} if t<0, e^{at}x(t)= 1+ C or x(t)= (1+ C)e^{-at} if t\ge 0. Since we must have x(0)= 0, we must have x(0)= 1+ C= 0, C= -1.

x(t)= -e^{-at} if t< 0, x(t)= 0 if t\ge 0.
 
Thanks guys,

Unfortunately, the final system I am interested in is much more complicated and contains the following non-linear equation (michaelis menten) as a sub unit.

dx/dt = - (a*x(t))/(b+x(t)) + d *delta(t) x(0) = 0

The example above was just a simple example. So it is more proper to write

dx/dt = f(x(t)) + d*delta(t) x(0)=x0

where x and d are n-dimensional. Hence, I cannot solve this analytically and therefore, I am looking for an equivalent formulation without delta (if it exists) or some numerically techniques to integrate to whole system with delta.

I hardly remember a talk about impulsive differential equations. Is this a IDE?

Any ideas?
 
One approach to the numerical method is, depending on your method, to substitute for the Dirac delta function, an impulse that takes a finite amount of time but with similar properties under your numerical integration method.

i.e. if you method involves dividing the time axis into lots of smaller times ##\Delta t## then the ##\Delta t## block at t=0 corresponding to ##A\delta(t)## has value ##A/\Delta t## so the integral behaves itself.

I'm pretty sure HallsofIvy knows a better one though.
 
So this is enzyme kinetics? I think it is useful with ill-defined mathematical problems to discuss what they describe physically to pick the right solution. What does the delta term stand for? Where does integration start (t=0 or t=-infinity)?
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top