Can the Implicit Function Theorem be Applied to Solve this System of Equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Implicit Function Theorem to the system of equations defined by x² + y² + z² = 6, xy + tz = 2, and xz + ty + e^t = 0. The mixed-partial derivatives matrix was initially miscalculated due to an incorrect equation, but upon correction, the determinant of the revised matrix was found to be non-zero. This confirms that explicit functions for x, y, and z as C¹ functions of t can be derived near the point (-1, -2, 1, 0). The conclusion is that the Implicit Function Theorem is applicable in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Implicit Function Theorem
  • Familiarity with mixed-partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of determinants and matrix invertibility
  • Basic concepts of C¹ functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Implicit Function Theorem in detail
  • Learn about mixed-partial derivatives and their applications
  • Explore matrix theory, focusing on determinants and invertibility
  • Research C¹ functions and their significance in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as educators and researchers interested in the applications of the Implicit Function Theorem in solving systems of equations.

minderbinder
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can the equation x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 3, xy + tz = 2, xz + ty + e^t = 0 be solved for x, y, z as C^1 functions of t near (x, y, z, t) = (-1, -2, 1, 0)?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The mixed-partial derivatives matrix I got was:
[2x, 2y, 2z, 0]
[y, x, t, z]
[z,t,x, y+e^t]

Plugging in the numbers I get:
[-2, -4, 2, 0]
[-2, -1, 0, 1]
[1, 0, -1, -1]

I know the theorem states that when this matrix is invertible, it means explicit functions exist, however, how should I proceed as the matrix is not square?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point in question, (-1, -2, 1, 0) is not on the sphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 3. IOW, the first three coordinates of this point don't satisfy the sphere's equation. That seems problematic to me.
 
I just looked up the errata for the textbook I was using. It looks like the author made a mistake and the first equation is actually supposed to be x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 6.

So with that, and re-reading the theorem, I think the answer should be as follows:

The mix-partial derivatives matrix of the variables I want to solve for is:
[-2, -4, 2]
[-2, -1, 0]
[1, 0, -1]

Determinant of this is non-zero. Therefore, the conclusion is that explicit functions are possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K