Can the Moon's rotation be affected by Earth's tides?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
The Moon is tidally locked to Earth, completing one rotation approximately every 28 days, which is why we always see the same side. Tidal forces create a bulge on the Moon, leading to a gravitational imbalance that maintains this lock. Over time, without external interference, celestial bodies would synchronize their rotation and orbit periods, but the Sun's influence prevents this for both the Moon and Earth. The discussion also touches on how solid tides exist on the Moon, albeit much smaller than those on Earth, and how these have contributed to the Moon's current rotational state. Ultimately, the Moon's rotation is a result of complex gravitational interactions over billions of years.
willib
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Our moon does not turn ??

Not at all ??
One would think that after a milenia of being bombarded by comet debris and asteroids that they would have nudged it a little..?
couldnt we spin it ourselves .?
I for one am tired of looking at the same view of the moon ,every full moon same picture... :mad:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The moon does turn. It completes one rotation in about 28 days. Since it also completes one orbit in about 28 days, we see the same side.

Given enough time and without outside interference, all the planets rotation periods (including Earth) would match their orbit period around the Sun and all of the planets' moons would do likewise. The Sun would be one such example of outside interference that would inhibit the Moon's rotation and orbit periods around the Earth from 'synching up'. Likewise, the Moon would be an example of outside interference that would inhibit the Earth from synching up it's rotation and orbit period around the Sun.
 
But why: tidal forces make the moon bulge at the center, which in turn causes a force imbalance that keeps it tidally locked with the earth.
 
Is it possible that :

1) moon got shot out of Earth in the beggining of solar system and ever since it faces Earth since it was slowly detached from Earth without allowing it to rotate in any other sides ?

2) moon has a dense core that is slightly off its centre, due to which only one side that is denser is facing the Earth's gravity ?
 
No, Russ is right about the reason for tidal lock (although your second reason is kind of right).

Think about the tides of the ocean and you'll realize he's right. High tide occurs on the Moon facing side of the Earth and the opposite side from the Moon.

Same thing happens with the planet's or moon's interior, but much, much, slower. Take Earth for example - any minisule deformity caused by the Sun's gravity at 0 degrees longitude when it's local noon over 0 degrees is approximately corrected when it's 6:00 local time over 0 degrees. However, unless the orbiting object is of a perfectly uniform distribution, one alignment of the planet is just slightly more stable gravitationally than any others, so the corrections are never really perfect.

If the planet were rod shaped instead of spherical, the effect would be much more obvious. The long axis of any orbiting object tends to align itself with the object's radius.

Your second answer is only kind of right because the Moon's going to rotate about it's center of mass, not off to the side of it. But your general concept is right.
 
Following up on BobG's look at Earth's tides.

Earth's tides follow the Moon around our planet. Or more accurately, the tides don't move while the Earth spins underneath them every 24 hours.

What would happen to those tides if all the water in the oceans froze instantly? They would try to follow the Moon, but, being solid, they would have to drag the rest of the Earth with them. The drag would cause the Earth to spin spin down until the tidal bulges were aligned with the Moon.

The Moon already is solid. It still has tides, but they're solid - inches not feet or yards. But it's enough. After billions of years, the Moon's rotation has slowed until any bulges are aligned with Earth.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top