Can the Pauli Exclusion Principle explain the quantization of the nucleus?

nuclear420
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
My professor mentioned that the pauli exclusion principle applies to the nucleus. How exactly is the nucleus quantized (the protons and neutrons), and how do the quantization rules apply to it (such as pauli's, hunds, and so on). Also, is this the reason why we don't observed multiple neutrons bound by strong nuclear force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After some Wiki-ing, I found out that all fermions are restricted by the Pauli exclusion priniciple. Do do the energy levels fill the same way as electrons (1s2,2s2,2p6 and so on)? And in what ways are these levels filled with protons and neutrons?
 
Have you tried a search on "nuclear shell model" or something similar? As I recall, the levels 1s, 1p, etc. fill up in a sequence that is somewhat similar to the sequence that atomic electrons follow, but there are significant differences because the shape of the effective potential energy function is different. Nuclear physics textbooks (e.g. Krane) should cover this in detail. (My own understanding is at the level of introductory modern physics textbooks such as Beiser or Taylor/Zafiratos/Dubson.)
 
Are you sure you also know WHY the nuclear levels are different than the atomic? This is essential :-)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top