Can the Planck Function Determine Single Photon Emitted Flux?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rod Brown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Function Planck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Planck Function in determining the emitted flux of a single photon from a black body source. It is established that integrating the Planck Function over all wavelengths yields the radiated power per unit area, while using it unintegrated allows for the calculation of emitted flux at a specific photon energy or frequency. The conversation highlights that the spectral energy density and spectral emissive power formulas approximate quantized distributions to smooth distributions, with the emitted energy per unit area being zero at any particular wavelength. The nuances of defining these distributions in terms of wavelength and frequency are also addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Planck Function and its applications
  • Knowledge of black body radiation principles
  • Familiarity with spectral energy density and spectral emissive power
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and photon energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Planck Function in thermal radiation
  • Explore the differences between spectral energy density and spectral emissive power
  • Learn about quantized distributions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of integrating functions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in thermal radiation, students studying quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of black body radiation.

Rod Brown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For my own edification.

The Planck Function when integrated over all wavelengths will give the radiated power per unit area for a black body. Would I be right in thinking, that if I had a known temperature for the black body source or indeed a kT value for that source that by using the function unintegrated, an emitted flux can be found for a single photon energy (frequency) being emitted by that source rather than a range? does Bv = emitted flux in the usual sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The formulae for spectral energy density and spectral emissive power (per unit area) 'approximate' the quantised distributions to smooth distributions. I've put 'approximate' in quotes, because the approximation is, to all intents and purposes, undetectable.

So when you use these distributions, the energy density or emitted energy per unit area is zero at any particular wavelength (or frequency), just in the same way as the probability of finding on a beach a pebble of mass 1.0000000000000000000000000000... gram (or 1.08172305825769346720638560... gram) is zero.

That's why the formulae are often written as u[itex]\lambda[/itex] d[itex]\lambda[/itex] = [stuff]d[itex]\lambda[/itex] and E[itex]\lambda[/itex] d[itex]\lambda[/itex] = [similar stuff]d[itex]\lambda[/itex], including d[itex]\lambda[/itex] on each side.

Note that you can also define spectral energy density and spectral emissive power as distributions in terms of frequency. The formulae are somewhat different, and it is easy to make mistakes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K