Can the speed of light truly be constant from its origin of motion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragohunter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Origin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of light is universally constant at approximately 299,792 kilometers per second (c) from any frame of reference, as established by the principles of physics. Photons, being massless particles, do not undergo acceleration; they exist at speed c from the moment of their creation. This discussion highlights the paradox of light's motion, suggesting that photons do not "start" moving but are always in motion at c, challenging traditional notions of motion and inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Knowledge of photon characteristics and behavior
  • Familiarity with the concept of massless particles
  • Basic grasp of inertia and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Einstein's theory of special relativity
  • Explore the concept of massless particles in quantum physics
  • Study the relationship between light speed and spacetime
  • Investigate the philosophical implications of constant motion in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of light and motion in the context of modern physics.

Dragohunter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Now I know light motion is consistence from any frame of reference and can’t accelerate since it is mass less and lacks momentum. So the speed of light is always c. What about the point where light started? So does that imply that the speed of light was c at the point it was starting? That means it was moving at point in which it started which is confusing to me. That means it didn’t “start” moving since that would imply it started at a certain point and then started to travel at c or accelerated, which is wrong. I’m probably looking at this wrong so I need explanations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A photon exists at no other speed but C. The instant it is created, it is moving at C. No acceleration.
 
I know that but it the symmetry of the incident sounds strange that it was moving at C at the point in spacetime it was created. That means that it was always at C and there is no start to its motion by rather it was always in motion. How can something be in motion without anything causing it to start moving? I know about inertia but all objects started at some point where it moved faster.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad The Einstein Clock aka Light Clock
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Undergrad One way speed of light
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
Undergrad Is the concept of a one-way speed of light meaningful and measurable?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
High School Prove the velocity of a moving object is absolute in one IRF?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Undergrad ##x'=0## and ##t'=0## axes in railcar thought experiment
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
High School Traveling through space at zero km/s
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Undergrad How do non-diagonal indices of a metric allow for local flatness?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
High School Question about the relative motion of an eye relative to light source
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Speed of light one more time
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate 1-Way Speed of Light
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K