Can This Integral Equation Be Solved Analytically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gursimran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
The integral equation presented involves non-elementary functions, making it analytically unsolvable in a closed form. Attempts to compute it using MATLAB's symbolic toolkit resulted in an indeterminate outcome, while Maple provided a complex expression involving polylogarithms. Non-elementary integrals lack finite, closed-form solutions and are common in various mathematical problems. Despite the challenges, numerical methods can still be employed to approximate these integrals effectively. The distinction between elementary and non-elementary integrals is often blurred due to the availability of computational tools that handle such calculations.
gursimran
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to solve this integral ??

Homework Statement


Is it possible to solve this integral equation analytically. Actually I wanted to curve fit some data in MATLAB using a equation of which this is a part. I tried various techniques all in vain. PLease help..


Homework Equations


int((x^4)*(e^2)/((e^x)-1)^2)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


gursimran said:

Homework Statement


Is it possible to solve this integral equation analytically. Actually I wanted to curve fit some data in MATLAB using a equation of which this is a part. I tried various techniques all in vain. PLease help..


Homework Equations


int((x^4)*(e^2)/((e^x)-1)^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


It involves "non-elementary" functions. Here is what I get using Maple:
f:=x^4/(exp(x)-1)^2:
J:=int(f,x);
Maple's answer is
J:= -x^4/(exp(x)-1) + x^5 /5 + (12x^2 - 4x^3) polylog(2,exp(x)) +
(12x^2 - 24) polylog(3,exp(x)) + (24 - 24x) polylog(4,exp(x)) +
24 polylog(5,exp(x)) - x^4 + (4x^3 - x^4) log(1-exp(x))
Here, Maple uses the non-elementary function
polylog(a,z) = sum_{n=1..infinity} z^n / n^a .


RGV
 


Thanks for replying, I read the article in non elementary intergrals, however there isn't satisfactory explanation given. I'm doing undergraduate and have never heard of non elementary integrals. Is that mean that you can't solve these integrals analytically without computers and how this is different from numerical integration. Even in numerical integration we can find integration and then fit a polynomial or any other taylor series. So we won't call that a integral.

BTW I tried to compute this in MATLAB symbolic toolkit, it says its indeterminable. How can mathematica solve it. can mathematica solve integrals better than matlab?

Ray Vickson said:
It involves "non-elementary" functions. Here is what I get using Maple:
f:=x^4/(exp(x)-1)^2:
J:=int(f,x);
Maple's answer is
J:= -x^4/(exp(x)-1) + x^5 /5 + (12x^2 - 4x^3) polylog(2,exp(x)) +
(12x^2 - 24) polylog(3,exp(x)) + (24 - 24x) polylog(4,exp(x)) +
24 polylog(5,exp(x)) - x^4 + (4x^3 - x^4) log(1-exp(x))
Here, Maple uses the non-elementary function
polylog(a,z) = sum_{n=1..infinity} z^n / n^a .


RGV
 


gursimran said:
Thanks for replying, I read the article in non elementary intergrals, however there isn't satisfactory explanation given. I'm doing undergraduate and have never heard of non elementary integrals. Is that mean that you can't solve these integrals analytically without computers and how this is different from numerical integration. Even in numerical integration we can find integration and then fit a polynomial or any other taylor series. So we won't call that a integral.

BTW I tried to compute this in MATLAB symbolic toolkit, it says its indeterminable. How can mathematica solve it. can mathematica solve integrals better than matlab?

I don't have Mathematica (I use Maple instead), but since the integral is not elementary, Mathematica will not be able to do anything very different. Perhaps it would express the answer using non-elementary functions different from Maple's polylog, but the result will still be in terms of non-elementary functions.

Non-elementary integrals are just integrals for which we have no finite, closed-form formula. They appear all over the place, in many types of problems. For example, the integrals of sin(x)/x or exp(x)/x are non-elementary; the integral of exp(-x^2) is non-elementary; the integral of sqrt((1-x^2)*(1-k*x^2)) is non-elementary, etc. Nevertheless, whether or not an integral is elementary, we still need methods of computing it numerically, and many ways exist of doing that (such as good approximations, series expansions, or straight numerical methods, etc.) Some scientific calculators have buttons that give the integral of exp(-x^2), for example, and all spreadsheets have similar capabilities. Programs like Maple or Mathematica can compute a wide variety of such functions, and are so easy to use that the distinction between "elementary" and "non-elementary" almost disappears.

RGV
 


Thanks a lot, for your help
Ray Vickson said:
I don't have Mathematica (I use Maple instead), but since the integral is not elementary, Mathematica will not be able to do anything very different. Perhaps it would express the answer using non-elementary functions different from Maple's polylog, but the result will still be in terms of non-elementary functions.

Non-elementary integrals are just integrals for which we have no finite, closed-form formula. They appear all over the place, in many types of problems. For example, the integrals of sin(x)/x or exp(x)/x are non-elementary; the integral of exp(-x^2) is non-elementary; the integral of sqrt((1-x^2)*(1-k*x^2)) is non-elementary, etc. Nevertheless, whether or not an integral is elementary, we still need methods of computing it numerically, and many ways exist of doing that (such as good approximations, series expansions, or straight numerical methods, etc.) Some scientific calculators have buttons that give the integral of exp(-x^2), for example, and all spreadsheets have similar capabilities. Programs like Maple or Mathematica can compute a wide variety of such functions, and are so easy to use that the distinction between "elementary" and "non-elementary" almost disappears.

RGV
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K