Can total angular momentum j be negative?

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm just stuck on one part of a larger problem. I need to find the range of total angular momentum values for an electron in a j-j coupling scheme.

Homework Equations


j= l + and - 1/2

The Attempt at a Solution


The electrons here are in a 5d 6s configuration. So for the second electron, l=0. This means j for the second electron is 0 plus and minus 1/2, so -1/2 and +1/2. This formula for j is what my book says to use with j-j coupling, but it seems to imply that j can be negative, and if that were the case, couldn't then J be a complex number? (Recall J=root(l(l+1))*hbar)
Just a little stumped here, and I want to get this right so I don't screw up the rest of the problem. Thanks for any hints
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##j## cannot be negative. The ##l = 0## case is a little special. You only get ##j = l + 1/2## in this case. ##j = l - 1/2## is ignored when ##l = 0##
 
I appreciate the response! Cheers
 
TSny said:
The ##l = 0## case is a little special. You only get ##j = l + 1/2## in this case. ##j = l - 1/2## is ignored when ##l = 0##
I would disagree that ##l=0## is a special case. When summing angular momenta ##\hat{j}_1## and ##\hat{j}_2## into ##\hat{J} = \hat{j}_1 + \hat{j}_2##, the quantum number ##J## can take the values
$$
J = \left| j_1 - j_2 \right|, \left| j_1 - j_2 \right| + 1, \ldots, j_1 + j_2
$$
The absolute value prevents ##J## from being negative, whatever the relative values of ##j_1## and ##j_2##.
 
DrClaude said:
I would disagree that ##l=0## is a special case.

Yes, you are right.

From the OP it appears that the textbook might have written ##j = l \pm \frac{1}{2}## when combining the orbital and spin angular momentum of a single electron. Hopefully it was made clear that this doesn't hold for ##l = 0##.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top