Can total angular momentum j be negative?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total angular momentum quantum number j cannot be negative, particularly in the context of j-j coupling schemes. For an electron in a 5d 6s configuration where l=0, the only valid value for j is +1/2, as the -1/2 option is disregarded. This conclusion is supported by the principle that when summing angular momenta, the total angular momentum J must always be a non-negative value, derived from the absolute difference of individual angular momentum values. The discussion clarifies the misconception that j could be negative in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with j-j coupling schemes in atomic physics.
  • Knowledge of quantum numbers and their significance in electron configurations.
  • Basic grasp of the mathematical representation of angular momentum, including the formula J=root(l(l+1))*hbar.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of j-j coupling in multi-electron systems.
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of angular momentum values in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the significance of orbital and spin angular momentum in atomic structure.
  • Investigate the behavior of angular momentum in different coupling schemes, such as LS and jj coupling.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, atomic physics, and anyone interested in the behavior of angular momentum in electron configurations.

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm just stuck on one part of a larger problem. I need to find the range of total angular momentum values for an electron in a j-j coupling scheme.

Homework Equations


j= l + and - 1/2

The Attempt at a Solution


The electrons here are in a 5d 6s configuration. So for the second electron, l=0. This means j for the second electron is 0 plus and minus 1/2, so -1/2 and +1/2. This formula for j is what my book says to use with j-j coupling, but it seems to imply that j can be negative, and if that were the case, couldn't then J be a complex number? (Recall J=root(l(l+1))*hbar)
Just a little stumped here, and I want to get this right so I don't screw up the rest of the problem. Thanks for any hints
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##j## cannot be negative. The ##l = 0## case is a little special. You only get ##j = l + 1/2## in this case. ##j = l - 1/2## is ignored when ##l = 0##
 
I appreciate the response! Cheers
 
TSny said:
The ##l = 0## case is a little special. You only get ##j = l + 1/2## in this case. ##j = l - 1/2## is ignored when ##l = 0##
I would disagree that ##l=0## is a special case. When summing angular momenta ##\hat{j}_1## and ##\hat{j}_2## into ##\hat{J} = \hat{j}_1 + \hat{j}_2##, the quantum number ##J## can take the values
$$
J = \left| j_1 - j_2 \right|, \left| j_1 - j_2 \right| + 1, \ldots, j_1 + j_2
$$
The absolute value prevents ##J## from being negative, whatever the relative values of ##j_1## and ##j_2##.
 
DrClaude said:
I would disagree that ##l=0## is a special case.

Yes, you are right.

From the OP it appears that the textbook might have written ##j = l \pm \frac{1}{2}## when combining the orbital and spin angular momentum of a single electron. Hopefully it was made clear that this doesn't hold for ##l = 0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K