Can Two Control Signals Be Safely Connected to a Single Phase Contactor Coil?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and safety of connecting two separate control signals to a single phase contactor coil in a circuit designed for controlling security lights. The context includes considerations of electrical wiring practices, potential risks, and the role of a certified electrician in the implementation of the proposed setup.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether it is safe to connect two 120V control signals to a contactor coil from the same power source without causing damage, suggesting that the signals would be in phase and operate in a parallel arrangement.
  • Another participant confirms that if the two switches are sourced from the same breaker and connected to the same contactor terminal, there should be no issue.
  • A different participant warns against connecting control signals from different breakers, emphasizing the importance of not mixing return wires and ensuring that each breaker’s output returns through its own neutral.
  • One participant suggests that a contractor would likely wire the control signals from the same breaker if instructed to do so.
  • Another participant proposes that using two sources from different breakers would necessitate the use of two contactors, explaining a potential configuration involving a bypass switch.
  • There is a suggestion that using the same source for both the timer and the bypass switch is a common practice, questioning the need for two different sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the safety and practicality of connecting control signals from different breakers versus the same breaker. While some agree that using the same breaker is acceptable, others highlight the risks associated with mixing sources, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of wiring practices, including the necessity of adhering to electrical codes and the potential complications of using multiple breakers. There is uncertainty regarding the specific practices that a contractor might employ and the conditions under which different configurations would be appropriate.

smoran22
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I have a contactor that I want to use with two separate control sources, on a site with a single phase power source, is it possible to connect two 120V control signals to the contactor coil, potentially live at the same time and connected to the same source, without causing a short, or damaging any equipment? The circuit is being designed to automatically turn on security lights at intervals set on a time clock, but with the addition of a manual override to turn on the lights as needed. I am not an electrician, but the work will be completed by a certified electrician once the planning for the building upgrades is complete. I'm just trying to understand how this would work. My understanding is that since the power is coming from the same breaker panel and the same power source, the two control voltages should always be in phase, eliminating the possibility of constructive and destructive interference. I would think that this setup would be considered a parallel arrangement? Meaning there would never be more than 120V supplied to the coil if both inputs were on, but the current available to the coil would be higher? Or would that supply too much current to the coil and cause problems? I'm just curious, I don't know how the electrical contractor will actually hook everything up when the time comes, but I have to admit I find this concept rather fascinating and I'd like to know a little more about it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If what you are suggesting is two switches in parallel sourced from the same exact breaker and connected to the same contactor terminal, then there is no issue.

If it is coming from a different breaker in the control panel, then NO! since it could come from different input leg (I guess you say it is single phase), and NO! you must not short the output of two breakers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and smoran22
Thank you! I definitely learned from that! In the real world, is it likely an electrical contractor would do it this way, or would they likely do something entirely different? I know its hard to say because it depends on the contractor, but is there a simpler way to accomplish the same task?
 
meBigGuy said:
NO! you must not short the output of two breakers.

not only mustn't you short them,

you mustn't mix their return wires either. What goes out through one breaker must return through THAT SAME breaker's neutral.
 
Just tell the contractor to wire them from the same breaker. That is probably what he would do anyway if you told him nothing.
(assuming you are in a country with an enforced Electrical Code)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
Why does it have to be from two different sources? The same source can feed the timer AND the bypass switch - this is very common.
 
If, indeed, you MUST use two sources from two different breakers, then you also need two contactors. The extra contactor, whose coil is powered by the second breaker through the bypass switch, switches power from the first breaker to the primary contactor. (or vice versa, the timer powers the second contactor)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
869
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K