Can Two-Moves Separate Components of a Link in Knot Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter de1irious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knot theory Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that every link is two-equivalent to a trivial link with the same number of components. The initial inquiry involves separating a simple link with a linking number of 1 into its two components and generalizing this for links with n linking numbers. A participant humorously admits to lacking knowledge in knot theory but expresses hope for assistance. Another contributor suggests that two-moves can be shown to encompass a different type of move that effectively separates link components. The conversation highlights the complexity of knot theory and the search for a generalizable solution.
de1irious
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I need to show that every link is two-equivalent to a trivial link with the same number of components. Right now I can show that if I have a simple link with linking number = 1, then it is possible to immediately separate the link into its two components. But how can I generalize this idea t links of n linking numbers? Any ideas?

For those interested, this is 3.7 in Invariants of Knots, the Knot Book by Adams.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If it's not theory we can't help you. :-p

I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist the pun. I really should've because I don't know anything about knot theory and I can't actually help you. I hope someone does soon.
 
Haha :rolleyes:

Actually I think I figured it out. You can show two-moves contain a certain other kind of move, which more clearly is able to separate components of a link.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top