Can USB Cables & Ports Survive Over-Standard Voltage/Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cave_cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Usb
AI Thread Summary
USB cables can generally tolerate higher voltages and currents than the standard specifications, with some cables potentially handling up to 8V and 0.7A without failure. However, USB ports are less resilient, as applying more than 5.25V can cause permanent damage. While USB cables may withstand significant voltage, the integrated circuits in connected devices are at risk when exceeding standard power levels. The discussion suggests that using custom adapters with USB components is feasible, but caution is advised regarding the limitations of the ports. Overall, while cables may survive higher demands, the associated electronics should be carefully considered to avoid damage.
cave_cat
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
would commodity usb cables and ports survive an over-standard voltage and current??

suppose we want to make an adapter to power a gadget that require more voltage and power than what is allowed by the USB standard. But, suppose we try to use off-the-shelf USB cable in the above-standard demanding gadget and a USB port where that cable would plug in in the adapter. (For safety purposes maybe we would find a cheap way to slightly alter the "hyper usb plug" and "hyper usb port" so that they would mechanically refuse to interoperate with regular ones, but this is off topic for this question).

Well, so would the usb cable and port survive usage at higher voltage and current? If we did empirical tests on cables and ports from various manufacturers at let's say 8V and 0.7A, should we expect to find at least some that would work fine, or are they explicitly limited according to the standard and so would melt or something like that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


I just happen to have hacked up a USB cable and the wires look to be around .015" diameter conductor with about .010" of insulation.

According to this nice wire table:
http://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm
#24 is .020" and good for .5A in power transmission mode, which matches the USB spec so maybe it's #24. By pushing your luck and calling it "chassis wiring" you could get up to 3.5A...

Then I found a "spec" for telephone wiring, which is maybe sort of like the USB wire:
http://www.spsx.com/uploadedFiles/Communications_Cable/Docs/PDF/Tech-Guidelines/TG31-Telephone-WireCable.pdf
This indicates that 300v between adjacent conductors is the most one can hope.

So you are probably well within your rights to ask for 8v and .7A out of most any cable...YMMV when taking advice from the internet however...
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I'm pretty sure USB cables can tolerate much higher voltages and current than the nominal 500 mA for USB 2.0 and 900 mA for USB 3.0. To reach the breakdown voltage of the dielectric used in the cable you would probably have to apply more than 200 V...

However the ports are much less tolerant. Applying a voltage of more than the nominal 5.25 V to a USB port may damage it permanently. But drawing an excessive current out the port is generally not a problem. I've not tested it, but I heared that USB ports are designed to simply shutdown when their power pins are shorted. Once the computer is rebooted everything comes back to normal.
 


schip666!, thanks for the interesting info.

LotusEffect, yeah, I understand that demanding more power out of an adapter that doesn't feel like giving it (like usb port in laptop) is not a good idea. But my question was predicated on having my own custom adapter that happens to use USB components because they are nice, off-the-shelf available components. So based on what schip666! says, sounds like it's doable.
 


The cables generally would do fine; it's the IC electronics they are connected to that will have the problem.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top