Can Vacuum-Filled Blimps Revolutionize Air Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for vacuum-filled blimps to revolutionize air travel, suggesting they could be safer than those filled with hydrogen or helium. While the square-cube law may favor blimps over helicopters, concerns about the practical advantages of using a vacuum instead of helium are raised, as the density difference is minimal. Questions about the availability of helium and its future depletion are also mentioned, with uncertainty regarding the urgency of the issue. The feasibility of expanding balloon structures electromagnetically is debated, with skepticism about the practicality of such technology without concrete evidence. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for realistic demonstrations rather than theoretical possibilities.
GTOM
Messages
963
Reaction score
66
I wonder could blimps come back if they arent filled with explosive hydrogen, neither with rare helium, but simply with vacuum, the lightest substance? Theoretically its possible to expand their balloons electromagnetically.
According to TV tropes, square cube law don't affect blimps so hard as helicopters, so while they would be slow, but they could be huge and reliable.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
Theoretically its possible to expand their balloons electromagnetically.
Do you have a source discussing this?

Helium has a very low density compared to air, the difference to a vacuum is tiny. Where is the advantage? The disadvantages are huge.
 
mfb said:
Do you have a source discussing this?

Helium has a very low density compared to air, the difference to a vacuum is tiny. Where is the advantage? The disadvantages are huge.

There are estimations about how long until fossils, uranium depleted. Is there any estimation how much time until helium depleted? As far as i know, it is only a tiny percent of fossil gases. Or shouldn't i worry about its availability even if we needed huge amounts to fill blimps?

I don't have an exact source about expand balloons electromagnetically, but if EM fields can repel each other, is there anything prevent such use?
 
GTOM said:
I don't have an exact source about expand balloons electromagnetically, but if EM fields can repel each other, is there anything prevent such use?
Practical reality? Seriously, what you are saying is just handwaving; it's backwards logic. Things are possible when demonstrated to be possible, not when "is there anything to prevent" it. If you don't have a specific idea of how this might be done, then it can't be realistically claimed to be possible.

Thread locked.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top